User talk:Saurabhmadan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Zcbi. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Blowdart | talk 11:19, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

This discussion has been moved to Talk:ZCBI - please post any further comments there --Blowdart | talk 12:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to ZCBI, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.

ZCBI has partnered the following organisations for providing education and Placements to its students, therefore we will have to mention the name of the companies and their lnks. No you don't. Wikipedia is not here to provide free advertising for your sponsors; nor is it here for what appears to be a non-notable educational establishment in the first place. Removal of templates without addressing the issues they raise is also frowned upon. The article has multiple problems; it has no citations and does not prove notability of the subject in question. I would ask that you address those issues first rather than providing what appears to be advertising for partners. --Blowdart | talk 11:53, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to ZCBI. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you.

OK we have a choice here really. Considering it's a new school with no citations (self citations from the school itself don't count - and I cannot find those scanned newspaper articles on the newspaper sites) it doesn't strike me as notable. The article itself is written like an advert, hence my massive pruning. To my mind after the pruning it still fails WP:Note, but at least it's not an advert and does not contain cut and pasted copyright violations from the university web site. Take a look at Harvard, or even the University of Essex (one of the partners) and compare them to your version. There is no listing of faculty, the education offerings are not full of advertising text and so on. Your previous version just read like an advert or a prospectus; not a suitable tone for an encyclopaedic article. I would ask you again to please look at your edits and consider how much they look like an advertisement. --Blowdart | talk 12:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
I have flagged this for a Third opinion and copied this to the ZCBI talk page. Please try to engage rather than just reverting and explain your thinking there. Thanks. --Blowdart | talk 12:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.


Contents

[edit] June 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on ZCBI. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 14:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of One year mba

A tag has been placed on One year mba, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | talk 16:04, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of One year pgp course

A tag has been placed on One year pgp course, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | talk 16:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Zcbilogo.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Zcbilogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 19:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC) --— HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 19:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC)