Talk:Saurabh Kalia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
|
More information about this article...
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
This article has an extremely biased point of view.
--Blue Bandit 22:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Kindly elaborate. Please cite you statements with references keeping POV's out of dicussion. --Geek1975 11:21, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
I notice that The language used in this article is almost exactly the same as an email doing the rounds calling for Indian patriotism and support. I think the references should link to reputable newspapers such as the Times of India... It does not appear neutral to me 130.102.0.170 (talk) 04:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] neutrality
The neutrality of this article is certainly suspect. There are many passages with words like 'brilliant' and 'excellent' that have no citations. N1ugl 21:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] citations added and article made more neutral
Only one usage of word brilliant is present. Citation to the same has been added from an official government websiteSaurabh Kalia where he is indeed described as a "brilliant" student. considering that user N1ugl falsely refers to "many" instances of words "brilliant" and "excellent", neutrality of his own objections is possibly suspect.
--Abhisri 02:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] read more carefully
I said there were many words _like_ excellent and brilliant. Meaning many words that had the same glamorizing effect, not necessarily repeated use of the same word. N1ugl 19:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] read more carefully
I said there were many words _like_ excellent and brilliant. Meaning many words that had the same glamorizing effect, not necessarily repeated use of the same word. N1ugl 19:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] please be more specific in future
1. Your objection was as to there being no citation for such words. To quote you.
"There are many passages with words like 'brilliant' and 'excellent' that have no citations."
You are misquoting yourself as well. I can still read "many passages" not "many words". Grammatically speaking, your sentence will be assumed to imply multiple occurrence of "brilliant" or "excellent", but I digress.
2. He has indeed been described at least as a brilliant student, having landed scholarships, as per official government sites. Citation regards same as been added.
Regardless, article now is far more neutral than earlier. Glamorization has been removed. Abhisri 05:09, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
