Talk:Satoshi Kanazawa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
With Wikipedia's credibility always at stake, I wonder does this page meet the WP:PROF (notability of academics as measured by their academic achievements), or is it merely a vanity project?
- You have a point - I don't think this particular academic meets the notability requirements.Stimpster 17:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Both of the studies listed in the article (most scientific discoveries made before mid-30s, and beautiful people have girl children) received a bit of significant press coverage. I personally think that this qualifies him under the proposed notability guidelines for academics, parts 1 and 3. -- Plutor talk 15:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Removal of info
IP address 90.206.101.27 removed my edit (I wasn't logged in) yesterday claiming it was inaccuarate:
However, flaws were later identified in the statistical analysis, meaning that many of the results were not statistically significant.[1]
It was published in a peer-reviewed journal (the same one the original article was in)? Why is it inaccurate? -3mta3 (talk) 12:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
I've added it back in, and changed the wording slightly so as to actually reflect the journal articles. -3mta3 (talk) 12:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)