Talk:Sarfraz Nawaz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

[edit] Sarfaraz v Sarfraz

There have been some edits here changing Sarfraz to Sarfaraz and vice versa. It does appear that Sarfraz is far more common. In google "Sarfraz Nawaz" cricket gets 21K hits while Sarfaraz gets 1290. In the Pakistani media, Dawn has 6 Sarfaraz and 75 Sarfraz while Jang has 14 Sarfaraz and 128 Sarfraz. I don't see why we should use Sarfaraz in this article, except provide a redirect from a page of that name. Tintin (talk) 08:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Strongly agree. I as a Pakistani, personally know that Sarfraz is extremely common. In Pakistan, minor variations in English transliterations of Urdu names are often ignored. Most prominent cricket web sites use Sarfraz instead of Sarfaraz. Szhaider 18:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
cricket ball Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability
Sarfraz Nawaz is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.



[edit] More information about Sarfraz Nawaz

I Have added more information and have posted the links too,some indian is changing the page again and again,if you have a geniune reason,disciss it here before you change it..

This information is biased, as most of the cricket media condemned his guessing that Woolmer was murdered, now it has been proven that fact is otherwise. He has old habit of guessing game and giving statements without even any source. he is notorious for his irresponsible statements. Please also add that aspect of his personality too. He is also notorious for giving very unethical personal statements about Imran, for example he said Imran Khan can never become a father that was proven to be wrong. he is disliked in Pakistan but this article is not showing real facts.

Please watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8zmdcQWijE and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRr9-2mGWQc to see how irrational this person is.