Talk:Sarah Louise Young
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Somebody deleted "She became sexually active at age 13, but was ashamed of her rapidly developing body and frequently wore clothing which hid her figure." along with one of the external links. No reason was given, and I can't imagine any reason for these alterations, so I have reverted to the previous revision. Anybody wanting to make deletions should please discuss it here first, or at least give a reason in the edit. - Pirate2000
Contents |
[edit] Change of Sarah Young's measurments
I have changed Sarah Young's measurements to a more creditable figure. I have taken the new measurements from a page on her official web site - http://sarahyoung.com/rankpages/featured.html. Mabal
[edit] Removal of Film Title.
I have removed the film "Even Hitler Had A Girlfriend" from the filmography. This is due to this Sarah Young not being in this film. I have a copy of the film, and although there is an actress in the film credited as Sarah Young, she is a totally different person to the Sarah Young detailed here. Mabal
Well, that's good to know. ThePeg 2006
[edit] Source Material
The source material for the 09:44, 27 April 2006 revision are articles/interviews that were published in Cosmopolitan Magazine, Issue 2/96, February 1996 and LOADED Magazine (UK), Issue 10, February 1995. Mabal
[edit] Reason for reversion of breast development age
I have reverted the age at which Sarah Young's breast began to develop back to 10 in reference to an interview she gave to Cosmopolitan Magazine, February 1996, issue 2/96 where she says –
Quote
“I was ten and still at junior school when my breasts developed,” she says. “It became a real problem back then, because boys and girls changed for gym in the same room. I didn’t want to wear a bra because I would have been the only one. But I got teased mercilessly. I was so ashamed of my bust, I’d wear big jumpers to cover it up. In the end, arrangements were made for me to dress separately.”
[edit] $1,000,000 for a single film
I'd be interested to see a source for this claim. I have a good idea of the economic realities of porn, and even back in the higher-budget days this would have been a ridiculous figure. If true, I suspect it was her husband paying her this sum (and therefore having no net impact on their joint assets), just for publicity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.16.115.126 (talk) 11:10, 2 May 2008 (UTC)