Talk:Sarah Larson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 March 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to actors and filmmakers on Wikipedia.
More information about this article... This article has a deprecated non-null importance= parameter. It should be replaced with priority=.

It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. Note: Wikipedia's non-free content use policy almost never permits the use of non-free images (such as promotional photos, press photos, screenshots, book covers and similar) to merely show what a living person looks like. Efforts should be made to take a free licensed photo during a public appearance, or obtaining a free content release of an existing photo instead.

What is so noteworthy of her dating George Clooney? Please she's a dime a dozen. She's one of the next girl in line in the Clooney Converter Belt. A total waste of wikipedia space. She's nothing but a gold digging, publicity whore.

What is so noteworthy of her dating George Clooney? Please she's a dime a dozen. She's one of the next girl in line in the Clooney Conveyor Belt. A total waste of wikipedia space. She's nothing but a gold digging, publicity whore.== Notability? ==

If her only notability to being Clooney's (current) girlfriend, a redirect to his article is what is appropriate. (And attending the Oscars with him is not encyclopedic). --ZimZalaBim ^talk 14:17, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

I hear you, man. I only made this change because I thought the redirect was stupid, I wanted to see a bit more about her. Now that she does have her own page maybe people who have more info about her can add it; people, who, perhaps, didn't know how to change it from a redirect page. Also, apparently, Clooney is supposed to be trying to get her parts in movies or something. I don't know, while she seems like she might forever be insignificant, there's still at least a solid chance that there'll be substantial stuff out there for her. JesseRafe (talk) 06:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

First, calling another user's edits "stupid" is probably not the brightest of ideas. Second, there are now three claims in the article about this person: she was a cocktail waitress, she appeared on Fear Factor, and she's dating George Clooney. I still fail to see how these make her notable in such a way that she should have an encyclopedia article. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 16:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

I fail to see what is not stupid about reading an article about George Clooney, seeing a wikilink on Sarah Larson within that article, clicking on it, and being back at the top of the same article on George Clooney I was just on. Are you one of those people who think that "nothing is stupid, and we shouldn't ever use that word"? Maybe it should just be let to stand for some time to see if more valid info is on its way. JesseRafe (talk) 03:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

I think I'd like to see as many articles as possible. Users aren't disadvantaged when articles are posted that don't seem important to them. But users are disadvantaged when articles they might want to read don't appear or are deleted. I'd argue that it's better to err on the side of inclusion.

[edit] She doesnt belong on Wikipedia

I'm all for deleting this article. She's been on one tv show, and is dating a movie star. There are much more noteworthy individuals who somehow have not yet merited a Wiki page, so why this broad? She's no one, no one important, no one interesting. Nothing. Thesetrixaintforkids (talk) 19:32, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The AfD discussion is here. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 19:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank youThesetrixaintforkids (talk) 21:53, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm glad something was here, as I saw some photo of her with Clooney, and I thought, "Now who the hell is that? How long have they been together? How did they meet--is she a movie star?" Still, since all these questions are about him, not her, and all she's done that is noteworthy besides being with him (which is noteworthy, but because of him) is to be a contestant on "Fear Factor" (and I don't think every reality show contestant is in Wikipedia), I think this entire thing can be placed as a paragraph in Clooney's Wikipedia page, at least until such time as he can get her a movie deal (before they break up, which might not be long, given his history, and then what will her noteworthiness be?).prosandcons (talk) 01:10, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Now that she's been dumped surely that is another reason to delete? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.97.98.36 (talk) 02:03, 12 June 2008 (UTC)