User talk:Santos25Q

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I wont be here for the next 2 months. I would appreciate it if I had bo one vandalizing my talk page.


RETIRED


This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.


[edit] Jake Morgan

I have placed this article up for deletion. There is very little encyclopedic value to it, as the character hasn't done anything besides be born, eat, and sleep. AniMate 21:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

You should never remove AfD tags from articles. I'm glad you reconsidered and restored it. Can you tell my why User:Reese Marshall redirected their talk page to your user page? Is this a second account you are using or is it unrelated? AniMate 23:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jake Morgan. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Elonka 23:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for 1 week

Since you have used a sockpuppet account (User:Reese Marshall) to vandalize Wikipedia articles and user pages, I have blocked you for 1 week. Your sockpuppet account has been indefinitely blocked. Once your block expires, you may edit again, but any further vandalism or sockpuppetry from you will result in this account also being indefinitely unblocked. You are on your final warning. Gwernol 23:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I, Santos25Q, hereby promise to be an anti-vandalist and folow all rules of wikipedia within my knoladgement. I want to prevent vandalism!

{{Helpme}} Where is Yamla anyway!

Good. I know you're partial to the Jake Morgan article. If you'd like to vote keep I'd be happy to post that and your rationale for keeping it, since you won't be able to edit until after the AfD is closed.
You should also consider WP:ADOPT once you get unblocked. Getting adopted by a more experienced Wikipedian might help you navigate the workings of the project a little better. For instance, they would tell you that you're not really using the {{Helpme}} template the way you're supposed to. AniMate 00:02, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Santos25Q, you have promised to stop vandalizing twice in the past, and each time you have broken that promise. Can you explain why we should believe you this time? Gwernol 00:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Also, could you explain why Claudia Antonia Zacchara shouldn't be speedy deleted. It's recreation of the deleted and salted Claudia Zacchara article. I find it very odd that your first edit was a fairly sophisticated and sneaky recreation of a deleted article. AniMate 00:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Good catch, AniMate. I've deleted Claudia Antonia Zacchara. Gwernol 00:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
I actually knew about it for a while, and was planning on taking it to WP:DRV. I just never got around to it (translation: AniMate was lazy). AniMate 00:27, 9 June 2008 (UTC)