User talk:Sanjiv swarup

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Hello

Hi! I see you started your account here in 2004! But did not do any edits for a looo...ooong time, becoming somewhat active only in March this year! That's interesting. Where do you stay now? Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 11:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] talk pages and uk taxation

Hi you moved my comment here. [1] . I am not sure if this was your intention or not. It is considered bad practice to move other users talk entries. See WP:TALK for guidelines, in particular WP:TALK#Others.27 comments.

I was commenting on the need to split Taxation in the United Kingdom. Both Morpph and I have suggested expanding the main article Taxation in the United Kingdom first before splitting into a smaller articles. See Wikipedia:Summary style for how this works. GameKeeper 15:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I did see your UK income tax . In my view this is NOT the best way to proceed. the best way would be to expand Taxation in the United Kingdom under the income tax section. Eventually the article will become large enough to be split up at which point Wikipedia:Summary style can be applied. Do you agree? WP:Size gives details of what is expected of article sizes. By splitting the article they way you have much of the information is in 2 separate articles , this is known as content forking and is to be avoided. GameKeeper 16:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edeskonline

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Edeskonline, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. GameKeeper 20:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


Sanjiv swarup 05:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Wiki is the most modern way of peer review . All the components and linkages of this article are genuine. I have personally tried out edeskonline. edeskonline has already been featured on several wiki articles / comparative articles. I therefore feel that this article is appropriate.

You want to include it because it is mentioned in other places in Wikipedia? This is NOT enough to make it noteable . See Wikipedia:Attribution/FAQ#Types_of_source_material for suitable sources. GameKeeper 06:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] UK income tax

Hi. I've noticed your change to Taxation in the United Kingdom which states you've "moved income tax info to an existing article". As a matter of urgency, could you identify that existing article by placing {{main|name of new article}} just below the Income Tax header in Taxation in the United Kingdom. I've been unable to find the new article you refer to. See Tax for some examples of this in use. from Winklethorpe

done: the name of the article is Income Tax Act 1842 Sanjiv swarup 10:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


Secondly, I'm a bit concerned by the move, and a couple of other people have previously commented they they feel it could be premature. It may be best to start a discussion of it in order to build a consensus - explain how you plan to expand on uk income tax so that it warrants a separate article. from Winklethorpe

++ The previous comments were when an entirely new article was created. Now, an independent article titled "Income Tax Act 1842" has been merged. In this manner, the history of the legislation along with the provisions are now available to any reader. Responses have come in with a good summary of current provisions. (please refer to the discussion page). Furthermore, a approximate tax planning scenario is planned to be shown. from Winklethorpe

Thanks Sanjiv swarup 10:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


On a minor point, you don't need to ~~~~ in edit summaries, only in talk pages. Winklethorpe 08:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC) noted with thanks Sanjiv swarup 10:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Sanjiv swarup for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. GameKeeper 15:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Split of UK income tax

You seem to have ignored my previous comment and that of other editors here and here, NOT to split the Taxation in the United Kingdom and have split it for a second time. Please do not work against Consensus GameKeeper 16:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by using sockpuppets to vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edeskonline.. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. --Akhilleus (talk) 00:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "As a user of several years standing, I disagree with the conclusion"

Decline reason: "No reason given for unblocking. — Yamla 15:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Blocking these users will be unfair to them. Sanjiv swarup 14:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your Userpage Deleted as Advertising

Your userpage is not to be used as advertising or as a pseudo-article. It is available for personal information about yourself. When adding personal information please remember that Wikipedia is not MySpace. Your userpage is for anything that is compatible with the Wikipedia project. It is a mistake to think of it as a homepage: Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site. Please see Wikipedia:Introduction and Wikipedia:User page for more information. Thanks. -- JLaTondre 16:52, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please do not change my talk page entries.

here you changed what I said, I consider this extremely rude. Can you please undo this change or do you agree that I can undo this? GameKeeper (talk) 08:30, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

noted: i am sorry. Please undo it Sanjiv swarup (talk) 01:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Red links

Hello Sanjiv,

I see you've been removing a lot of red links recently. Sometimes it's right to remove red links, but normally it's right to keep them. If the article might be created in the future, the red link should be retained to prompt people to create articles, and to make sure that when the article is created it's already linked from all the right places. Have a look at WP:REDLINK for a discussion about this. Thanks,

Stephen Turner (Talk) 10:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

noted: in future , i shall first mention it in the discussion page

Sanjiv swarup (talk) 01:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edeskonline

Hello, you seem keen to add references to eDeskOnline into wikipedia. Do you have a commercial interest in eDeskOnline? GameKeeper (talk) 12:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

I use eDeskOnline for keeping all my information handy. I have no commercial interest in the site. I fancy myself as a missionary for in-the-cloud-computing which I think is the future of productivity. Other areas of my interest is Direct Marketing, and making Wikipedia a better source of information

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Direct mail. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chris the speller (talk) 01:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

noted: in future , i shall first mention it in the discussion page

Sanjiv swarup (talk) 01:45, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 08:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


I did know. Several of my comments are initialed . Will be more careful. Sanjiv swarup (talk) 08:21, 24 February 2008 (UTC)