User talk:SanchiTachi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing because of disruptive soapboxing. If you wish to edit it, please ask an administrator to do so on your behalf, or request unprotection.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

John Locke, 2nd Treatises:

“To understand political power right, and derive it from its original, we must consider, what state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending upon the will of any other man.

A state also of equality, wherein all the power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, no one having more than another; there being nothing more evident, than that creatures of the same species and rank, promiscuously born to all the same advantages of nature, and the use of the same faculties, should also be equal one amongst another without subordination or subjection, unless the lord and master of them all should, by any manifest declaration of his will, set one above another, and confer on him, by an evident and clear appointment, an undoubted right to dominion and sovereignty.”

“But though this be a state of liberty, yet it is not a state of licence: though man in that state have an uncontroulable liberty to dispose of his person or possessions, yet he has not liberty to destroy himself, or so much as any creature in his possession, but where some nobler use than its bare preservation calls for it. The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions: for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent, and infinitely wise maker; all the servants of one sovereign master, sent into the world by his order, and about his business; they are his property, whose workmanship they are, made to last during his, not one another's pleasure: and being furnished with like faculties, sharing all in one community of nature, there cannot be supposed any such subordination among us, that may authorize us to destroy one another, as if we were made for one another's uses, as the inferior ranks of creatures are for our's. Every one, as he is bound to preserve himself, and not to quit his station wilfully, so by the like reason, when his own preservation comes not in competition, ought he, as much as he can, to preserve the rest of mankind, and may not, unless it be to do justice on an offender, take away, or impair the life, or what tends to the preservation of the life, the liberty, health, limb, or goods of another.“

"state of war is a state of enmity and destruction: and therefore declaring by word or action, not a passionate and hasty, but a sedate settled design upon another man's life, puts him in a state of war with him against whom he has declared such an intention, and so has exposed his life to the other's power to be taken away by him, or any one that joins with him in his defence, and espouses his quarrel; it being reasonable and just, I should have a right to destroy that which threatens me with destruction: for, by the fundamental law of nature, man being to be preserved as much as possible, when all cannot be preserved, the safety of the innocent is to be preferred: and one may destroy a man who makes war upon him, or has discovered an enmity to his being, for the same reason that he may kill a wolf or a lion; because such men are not under the ties of the commonlaw of reason, have no other rule, but that of force and violence, and so may be treated as beasts of prey, those dangerous and noxious creatures, that will be sure to destroy him whenever he falls into their power."

The obligation of all men is to protect the innocent from the predator and to ensure the safety and well being of those who are preyed upon. SanchiTachi 02:12, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Contents

GFDL

I think you have a misunderstanding as to how the GFDL works. Under the GFDL, you have extremely limited rights to control what others do. You do have some privileges under WP:USER and WP:TALK, but in licensing under the GFDL you give others the right to modify your works in any way they wish, so long as they properly attribute the author, and their contributions are also licensed under the GFDL. There are other limitations, but as far as wikipedia is concerned, anyone may modify your works, it's automatic. Sanchi Tachi, you're being unreasonable here. If you want to leave, you may do so, but continuing to stay here and fight is going to cost you any good will you have left. To be honest, I think it would be probably best for you to just leave the Wikipedia project. It doesn't seem like the restrictions of Wikipedia are quite what you're looking for. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 01:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

GFDL only applies to work not copyrighted at other places, and that work cannot be used unless it follows specific conditions, such as attributing the author and not putting up so much that it violates fair use. Thus, using more than a few lines of my work without me giving permission for its use, violates my copyright. If they want to remove all of my text and put their own on the website, they can. However, I overlooked releasing it and thus, I have the right to remove it completely. I am withdrawing from Wikipedia, thus, I am withdrawing the work that I have completed that I did not liscence Wikipedia to use wholesale. I will not let my work be edited to the point that it violates Games Workshop IP, such as changing the titles of things, or let my work be used by others to harass me. I didn't ask for people not to edit my work. I only ask now for my work, that which is my own, to be completely removed, which includes organization. It now directly infringes my ability to profit from my intellectual property without my explicit consent to have it put free to GFDL standards. It wouldn't have come down to this except for the highly inappropriate action of a few users and admin who refused to do what is their job and keep those users from harassing me.
My complaint is respect, which has not been shown. It is not respectful to follow another user around. As Wikipedia policy states, if there is an error, someone else can always correct it, and its not your duty to correct everything another user does. What Someguy did is harassment and does violate the Wikipedia policy. He was not repremanded. He was not warn to leave me alone. He was not told to let Emperor deal with things. Instead, he was left to continue to harass me and thinks what he did is fair. To let him continue is a slap in the face of everything Wikipedia stands for. You should be ashamed.
I would have let my work be used by Wikipedia, but I overlooked it and this level of respect made me reconsider. The users of wikipedia have proven that they aren't here for good will, but wish to harass those who actually contribute to make up for the fact that they are unable to contribute. This is an encyclopedia, and yet not one person involved in this besides me has contributed even close to what I contributed lately. Furthermore, most of the claims based by others are extremely unverifiable, which harms the encyclopedia, not helps. The fact that you ignored Someguy not listening to what you said and instead taking it upon himself to edit war against me shows that he doesn't respect you. Protecting him as you are doing is only letting him go on and on again.
I posted that information to tell people that I'm not fighting and that I am gone. I will delete anything else because I don't want to see anyone post anything about it. They want to continue harassing me and continue to show bad faith, violate etiquette and the rest. Thats their perogative. They don't feel like adding to pages that need adding to. Instead, they only care about harassing. Thats not Wikipedia and don't ever claim that what they do is somehow in line with Wikipedia. I only leave your post up because I respect you. However, this is my last comment to you here. I have made it very explicit that I don't want any more to deal with others here. For people to post and ignore directly shows a lack of Etiquette and breaking the Harass rule. No one has to come to my user page or my talk page. No one is forced to post here. The only reason they would post here is personal obsessive behavior that would keep them from leaving others alone and minding their own business. Good bye. SanchiTachi 02:01, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
And I am sure that you are clever enough to realize that I never had this kind of problem before Someguy started following, and that none of this was ever an issue before him. Put two and two together and you will see that who the antagonist is here. Also see how I never went to any of his pages and tried these stunts. SanchiTachi 02:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Page protected

I protected this page to stop you from continuing to moan despite your indefinite block. I hereby license this comment to the public domain. --Deskana (talk) 03:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

DYK

Updated DYK query On 30 May 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tyranid Hive Fleets, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 12:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Unprotection of this page / unblock of this user

SanchiTachi has told me, via e-mail, that some administrators think this talk page should be unprotected, and that he wishes for his block to be appealed. I offered him the chance to appeal to the ArbCom, and he replied to that offer with a rant about what I did wrong. He's also continuing to complain that he never released his contributions under GFDL, so I violated copyright law, which is total nonsense as by submitting your work to Wikipedia you agree to release it under GFDL. Therefore, I do not believe anything he says. In the case that he is telling the truth, I say the following...

  • Should anyone wish to unprotect this page to let him continue ranting at me (which is pretty much all he has done so far in our e-mail correspondance), then feel free, I have no contest. He says "5 other admin" are willing to do this, which I've seen no evidence of so far.
  • Should anyone wish to unblock him, discuss the matter with me and we'll see what we come up with. I don't believe anyone does want to unblock him, but if you do, you know what to do.

--Deskana (talk) 18:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

I have been in contact with SanchiTachi again. He informed me that I page a performed a history merge on, User:SanchiTachi/Graphic Novels Current moved to Black Library gaming (Warhammer 40,000), had copyrighted material from a website not covered under GFDL. He also informed me that I have been "reported to the foundation for your abuse of copyright infringment of another copyrighted website". I told him that I'm guilty of nothing, and that it's him that's guilty of copyright infringement as he was the uploader of the content. I asked for the URL of the website to fix this problem myself, and told him either way he's staying blocked as he violated copyright. As such, I don't think unblocking is a good idea at all. --Deskana (talk) 21:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Tanith-ghosts-blist.gif

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Tanith-ghosts-blist.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 13:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Kal_Jericho.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Kal_Jericho.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 13:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Leonatos.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Leonatos.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 13:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Broodlord.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Broodlord.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 16:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:GenestealerPatriarch.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:GenestealerPatriarch.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 16:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:GHybrid.gif

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:GHybrid.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 16:51, 14 August 2007 (UTC)