Talk:Sand whiting
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA Review
This article meets the GA criteria, and has been passed. The prose is good, readable, and interesting. References are overall sufficient, although it would help to have dates of retrieval added to the external links provided as inline citations (see WP:CITE). The article would benefit from have some more images or photos added to it, as it would help clarify some things. For example, a map illustration added to the range and habitat section would help.
Overall, the article looks good! There's no major significant issues. Cheers! Dr. Cash 00:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for that Derek, i will have to go back and redo nearly all the citations as "cite journal" and "cite book" sometime soon. As for images, i fully agree, but free images are suprisingly hard to come by. You would think for such a popular species, there would be images on Flickr etc, but there are none. Being i live in South Australia and not the eastern sates, its not easy to go haul a few sandies from the nearest beach either. As for the map, there is one in the taxobox. I put it there because the FA shark articles also have the range map in the taxobox, so i'll leave it there for the moment. Cheers Kare Kare 02:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Categories: GA-Class Fishes articles | Mid-importance Fishes articles | WikiProject Fishes articles | WikiProject Australian biota articles | GA-Class Australian biota articles | Unknown-importance Australian biota articles | GA-Class Australia articles | Mid-importance Australia articles | Wikipedia good articles | Wikipedia CD Selection-GAs | GA-Class Good articles | Natural sciences good articles