Santa Anna v. Frank
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Santa Anna v. Frank | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||
Argued January 26, 1885 Decided January 26, 1885 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Holding | ||||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||||
Chief Justice: Morrison Waite Associate Justices: Samuel Freeman Miller, Stephen Johnson Field, Joseph Philo Bradley, John Marshall Harlan, William Burnham Woods, Thomas Stanley Matthews, Horace Gray, Samuel Blatchford |
||||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||||
Santa Anna v. Frank, Illinois to support the judgment without reference to any question of the legal authority to issue the bonds described in the first count. Rev. St. Ill. 1870, c. 110, 58; Bond v. Dustin, 112 U.S. 604; S. C. ante, 296.
, was a case with no special finding of facts, the general finding of the issues for the plaintiff was not open to review by this court. Town of Martinton v. Fairbanks, 112 U.S. 670; S. C. ante, 321. Questions were discussed by counsel for the defendant as to the legal authority of the town to issue the bonds referred to, fairly arose upon the first count of the declaration. But their determination could not affect the judgment, for the common counts were sufficient under the statutes ofJudgment was affirmed.[1]
[edit] See also
[edit] References
- ^ Santa Anna v. Frank, 113 U.S. 339 (1885) Justia.com
[edit] External links
- 113 339 Justia.com (full case)
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.