User talk:Same As It Ever Was

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from causing disruption.

 This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Same As It Ever Was (talk • contribs • block logauto • rfcu confirmed socks) from using it to make disruptive edits or continuing to abuse the {{unblock}} template.
If you have come here to issue a new message to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This block is an outrage, I am not a sock puppet. Same As It Ever Was is and will alwawys be my only account. Alright I admit that I know User:Payne2thamaxx in real life, which is why he knows about stuff that I do and vice versa. Payne2thamaxx, or Eric is my roommate and is the reason that I got into Wikipedia. However while Payne2thamax/Payne2thamaxx and I share the same internet adress, we are two different people. I have done nothing but try to help Wikipedia by creating article after article while Payne...just check his block log. As for Wicked Wayz and TheNextOne. ??? Like I said before, I do not edit using any other user name but Same As It Ever Was, for all I know both could be innocent Users who are fans of Johnny Ca$h. I do not feel I should be blocked indef because I really have not done anything wrong. I will be the first to admit that my edit war with Tasc0 was wrong and maybe could have been handles differently, but right now I just want to continue to help wikipedia. Payne is working right now and I can only imagine that he will address his doings on his talk page in the coming future. I have created over 300 article, really have done no wrong except the edit war with Tasc0 and am not a Sock puppet, please let me come back."

Decline reason: "Please reread WP:SOCK. You are clearly admitting to being a meatpuppet here. — Yamla (talk) 18:13, 18 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I concur with Yamla that you should not be unblocked, but I don't believe your account. You clearly are either the same user as Payne2thamaxx or have participated in conflicts on his behalf. And while I sometimes have encountered this kind of story before, Payne2thamaxx is a known sockpuppeteer, which makes the story even less believable than normal. Mangojuicetalk 18:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Do I have to be blocked indef when all I ever did was help Wikipedia by creating articles? I am not a sockpuppet to Payne2thamax, nor am I a meatpuppet I have had only one conflict and that is with Tasc0 duo to his harmful reverts, while Payne2thamax has had countless conflicts, I am a completely different person. Do you see my contributions, I never had any problems with anyone except with Tasc0. I have dedicated my time to expanding Wikipedia and this is the thanks I get? Doesnt this mean anything to you guys? I am not a vandal, I am not a danger and above all else, I am not a sockpuppet. Maybe I should be blocked, but not indef when all I ever tried to do is help this site out. I thought this problem between Tasc0 and myself and I tried to just continue to help Wikipedia and I get blocked? Payne2thamax is gone and is never coming back, I still want to help this site. "Don't say goodbye to me like this". Same As It Ever Was (talk) 19:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
The evidence against your story is pretty strong. Can you explain everything that was brought up [[1]]? Particularly, the ways in which your editing interests overlap with Payne's. Mangojuicetalk 22:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Listen, I am not a sockpuppet. I love this site and as you can see by my contributions I have never done anything wrong, besides the now infamous edit war I had going with Tasc0 on the articles, Bloods & Crips and Bangin' on Wax. I had pointed out several times in my edit summaries that I disagreed with his reverts and told him why. I never meant for the madness that happened afterwards. As for Payne2thamax, are you serious? You admins are saying that I am a sockpuppet to that user? Are contributions are almost nothing alike, yeah we both edited the N.W.A articles but beyond that Payne2thamax/maxx mostly edited what looks like hockey articles. I know nothing whatsoever about the sport of hockey. And I also see that Spellcast brought up the vandalizing edits to Real Compton G's talk page. I did that? If you check my first few article that I created, you will see that Real Compton G help me start them, he was one of my closest friends on this site. And for the record, I never had a problem with Tasc0 before his reverts. But you wont believe me. For the last time I am not Payne2thamax or Payne2thamaxx. And another P2TM stated that he looks at my contributions, so what, that means that we are one and the same? I looked at Tasc0's contribs all the time, does that make me Tasc0 too? Look I love this site, but instead of creating articles now, I am stuck here trying to plead my case, there has to be someone out there to see that I am not Payne2thamax."

Decline reason: "Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Payne2thamaxx confirms that you are indeed abusing sockpuppet accounts. — Yamla (talk) 18:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Image source problem with Image:Every Hoods the Same 1.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Every Hoods the Same 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 17:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC)