Talk:Samurang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was nominated for deletion on 16/3/2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a project to build and improve articles related to Korea. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.
	Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please help us improve this article.
	???	This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

Martial arts Portal	This page is part of the Wikipedia Martial arts Project. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article if you think something is missing, please help us improve them! You may also wish to read the project's Notability guide.	Chinese Manual of Style - Naming conventions Japanese Manual of Style Korean Manual of Style - Naming conventions Biographies Manual of Style
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

SpiralKnot's edit [1] is inappropriate because it misleads readers into believing that only the etymology is wrong and that the Samurang did exist. --Nanshu 00:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Samurang myth was created sometimes in 80s or 90s. This is totally fabrication.Haidong Gumdo was also created in 80s--Hskf4 05:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

I have added the claim regarding the origins of the samurai again. Readers should be aware that the claim has been made by Haidong Kumdo organizations to know what the whole controversy is about. I am not adding this to further the fabrication, I merely point out its existence. The falsity of this claim as well as the dubious nature the existance of the samurang have been explained at length in the article. SpiralKnot 11:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)