Talk:Same-sex marriage in Maryland
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale. |
 |
Same-sex marriage in Maryland is part of WikiProject Maryland, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Maryland. |
||
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. |
Lincolnite -- Thanks for italicising the name of the case! I reverted the other two changes that were made today:
(1) You had placed an end quote in the middle of the quotation from Judge Murdock's decision -- I'm sure you just didn't see the end quote at the end of the paragraph.
(2) I've re-linked the first use of "2007."
Hope you don't mind... you're absolutely right about italics for the section heading.
kdogg36 03:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Made a couple minor changes... added in that there are two different state legislators that plan to submit bills in 2008 into each house. This might require a new section if they do submit those bills. "2008 Legislation" or some other such thing.
140.90.131.108 18:42, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
In light of the ruling and likely future events under this topic, I'm going to try to rearrange this article somewhat when I get a chance. As you can see, the original article was based around the lawsuit, which was appropriate because that was pretty much the story of same-sex marriage in Maryland until yesterday. Now it seems like there will be many other things to talk about, so the lawsuit will just have to be one (major) section in a more expansive article. kdogg36 01:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
Also -- when I did the article last year, I didn't know any better, and didn't treat the references correctly. And now I see that the ones from the Baltimore Sun are no longer available -- we should try to find existing references if possible. I'll work on this too, but if anyone wants to help with any of this, it would of course be much appreciated. kdogg36 01:04, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
This might prove useful as guide to who is supporting legislative action in favor of SSM ... http://www.equalitymaryland.org/pr_2008/pr2008.01.25.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.90.131.108 (talk) 17:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
