Talk:Sam McCall

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Television      (Rated start-Class) WikiProject Television     (Rated Start-Class) Television Portal This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. WikiProject Soap Operas      (Rated Start-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an attempt to build consistent guidelines for articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class.

Contents 1 Plot 2 Rumors 3 Baby Girl McCall 4 Uncited info 5 Back with Jason section 6 Infobox Image

[edit] Plot

Wikipedia is not the place for plot summaries, everything from SoapCentral should be kept on SoapCentral.

[edit] Rumors

• There has been no mention in GH of any abortion she has had. These are only rumors. Charleenmerced ^Talk 13:41, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced
• Can someone fix the timeline in my new hist update. I can't remember the sequence of events. Charleenmerced ^Talk 13:51, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Charleenmerced

[edit] Baby Girl McCall

Even though Sam spoke of naming her child Lila in honor of Jason's Grandmother, the baby's headstone reads Baby Girl McCall, meaning it was never named as Lila in any official record. So, please don't replace Baby Girl McCall with the name Lila.--Charleenmerced ^Talk 15:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Uncited info

I removed the entire character history section due to lack of any sources + WP:OR concerns. Feel free to readd when appropriately cited Corpx 15:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

• I think it was a bit extreme to delete most of the article, instead of trying to look for sources for the information. Since this is an episodic program, that happens everyday, there is basically one true source of info, General Hospital itself. THerefore, it is understood that the information is coming from GH. There is no need to delete the entire section. All the informaiton is correct, I have checked. But, we cannot not go ahead and look for sources for every line.--Charleenmerced ^Talk 15:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Corpx is under no obligation to try to find sources; Wikipedia policy very clearly states that it is the responsibility of the person adding the information (or re-adding it) to provide sources. Just because it's a daytime soap opera does not exempt this or any other article from the verifiability policies, including reliable 3rd party sources. 24.4.253.249 20:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Back with Jason section

Could someone who watches the show daily clean this section up some more? I removed some of the sentences for being run ons and just a bunch of rambling, but it could still use some more work. Also, a lot of the information should probably be dedicated to a section about Sam McCall's rivalry with Elizabeth Webber. Lizabethdawn 20:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

I actually think the entry has one too many sections as it is, it's turning into one long weekly drawn out recap--Jessie val jean 06:01, 6 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessie val jean (talk • contribs)

[edit] Infobox Image

It should be noted the Image:Samantha_McCall.jpg‎ which was used in the info box was deleted due to a missing fair use rationale after it had been tagged for 7 days. Also to be noted that this image was not identified as being subject to deletion on the article page as were several other images that were fixed prior to the 7 day expiration period. It seems that several admins are more concerned about deleting images that fixing the technical requirements. Dbiel ^(Talk) —Preceding comment was added at 01:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)