Talk:Sam Concepcion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to actors and filmmakers on Wikipedia.
This article is within the scope of Tambayan Philippines, the WikiProject and notice board for topics related to the Philippines. To participate, visit the Tambayan for more information.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This is an explicit copy violation - the author states where he "lifted" (his word [1]) the content from. Wickethewok 00:18, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] about the speedy deletion on the "Sam Concepcion" page

i'm sorry. i didn't realize that that article being questioned could be found at multiple sites. i only cited the one found in Sam Concepcion Article in clickythecity.com. if only i knew that that same article could also be found at Malaya, i would have cited it as well by placing a link in the article too...

sorry again for my mistake, it was my first time to upload a page. hope you could reconsider my copyright infringement case.. thank you! and have a good day! :)

[edit] Cleanup

Major POV bias/unacceptably formed prose here. PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THESE TAGS UNTIL THE ISSUE IS SETTLED. (|-- UlTiMuS ( UTC | ME ) 22:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

I am now requesting a complete rewrite of this article. Almost everything reeks of NPOV violation, uncited claims of grandeur ("Sam has achieved alot at such a young age", he will surpass other child singers", etc.), and overall informal unencyclopaedic tone. (|-- UlTiMuS ( UTC | ME ) 23:11, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

I have taken out some of the more egregious POV statements (destined to become a star...) as well as some external links to fan forums, which aren't absolutely necessary. ... discospinster talk 00:12, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
  • As soon as I saw this article roll past on recent changes, I wanted to reach for the {{advert}}. Was glad to see it had previously drawn attention to itself and is moving towards improvement. — MrDolomite | Talk 00:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

I edited a lot of the article, removed the unnecessary POV bias sentences, deleted the sentences leading to informal unencyclopedic tone and improved the grammar of the article. Also removed the sentences that were poorly sourced or had no citations. Is there anything needed still to be done?Sammyluvlucas 04:29, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Separation

I separated his career and personal life that used to be under "Rise to Stardom", since it seemed it was written in POV and looked too long.Sammyluvlucas 04:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:IMG 261434.jpg

Image:IMG 261434.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:19, 7 November 2007 (UTC)