Samuel Griffith Society

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article or section needs sources or references that appear in reliable, third-party publications.
Primary sources and sources affiliated with the subject of the article are generally not sufficient for a Wikipedia article. Please include more appropriate citations from reliable sources, or discuss the issue on the talk page.
This article has been tagged since March 2008.

The Samuel Griffith Society was founded by former Chief Justice Sir Harry Gibbs, John Stone and others in 1992 to promote discussion of constitutional matters through the articulation of a clear position in support of decentralisation of power through the renewal of our federal structure; defend the great virtues of the present Constitution against those who would undermine it in order to supplant it with a unitary state; to restore the authority of Parliament and defend the independence of the judiciary and to foster and support reform of Australia's constitutional system to these ends.

Named after Sir Samuel Griffith, one of the architects of the Australian Constitution, the society describes its prime role: "... to ensure that proposals to change the Australian Constitution will be subjected to the most intense scrutiny." It holds annual conferences and publishes an annual journal of conference proceedings entitled "Upholding the Australian Constitution".

1 Core beliefs
2 See also
3 References
4 External Links

[edit] Core beliefs

To oppose the further centralisation of power in Canberra.
To restore the authority of Parliament as against that of the Executive.
To defend the independence of the Judiciary.
To foster and support any reforms of Australia's constitutional arrangements which would help achieve these objectives.
To promote discussion on constitutional matters to establish a clear position in support of the decentralisation of government power.
To encourage a wider understanding throughout the community of the Constitution and the nation's achievement under it."

More recently it has criticised the Mabo Decision, supported Australia remaining a constitutional monarchy and opposed an introduction of a Bill of rights ^[1].