Talk:Saltire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article incorporates content from the 1728 Cyclopaedia, a publication in the public domain.
Heraldry and Vexillology Portal

Saltire is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (FAQ).

Contents

[edit] Request to Merge Article

Based on discussions in the Saltire and Saint Andrew's Cross articles, I request that Saint Patrick's Flag be merged into wherever those two articles eventually become merged into. I propose a new article entitled Saltire Cross; encompassing the heraldic design and origin of the Saltire (also called the St. Andrew's Cross and St. Patrick's Cross), and the design's use on flags such as those of both Scotland and Ireland. This would consolidate similar information, expand overall information on the same subject (the saltire), eliminate confusion, and make things more user-friendly. Thanks! --Dulcimerist 18:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Merge is complete. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 12:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Amsterdam Flag

Is this the same type of cross that appears on the flag and herald of Amsterdam? There should be a cross-reference, if so.

Yes, this design appears in triplicate on the flag of Amsterdam, and could be referred to in the article merger proposed above. --Dulcimerist 18:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Um, I've already added a mention of Amsterdam to the article. —Tamfang 06:09, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] St. Julian's Cross

Would there be much point in describing this saltire variation? Although I don't know who St. Julian was, this heraldic design is the Cross Crosslet Saltire. --Dulcimerist 05:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "Saltire" vs. "The Saltire"

It seems as though there's some confusion over the use of saltire in the heraldic sense, and the Flag of Scotland (sometimes referred to as "The Saltire"). Is it proper to call Scotland's flag "The Saltire," when so many other flags - Saint Patrick's Flag, Confederate Battle Flag, Cross of Burgundy Flag - likewise display a prominant saltire? Is there a way we might be able to avoid an "edit war" between the saltire and Flag of Scotland articles? --Dulcimerist 00:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

I see no sign of an edit war. Mais oui! and I have a disagreement over the interpretation of WP:DAB. I will leave his top note in place but we can discuss further on this talk page. Both articles have been around a long time without causing any fuss. I don't think there is such a thing as proper, just common usage, and it is common for Scottish people to refer to their flag as The Saltire. I don't know if Burgundians or Alabamans use the same expression for their saltires, but if they do, someone will tell us. Both articles educate readers about the Flag of Scotland without, in my opinion, confusing readers.
If people want to edit war, they will find anything to war about. If people want to have an enjoyable hobby editing an encyclopedia, then they will eventually find a way to work together. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:09, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Sounds good enough. I was simply concerned that an edit war might break out, but you're more familiar with the histories of these articles than I am.  ;) I agree with what you've typed. --Dulcimerist 04:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] gallery

I really don't see the need for a five image gallery on this page. Most of the images can be worked into the page structure, and a few are just superfluous. Thoughts? -- nae'blis 17:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Please work them into the article structure. I put them there because (a) I like galleries (b) it was a quick way to find a home for short bits of encyclopedic info that were cluttering the flow of prose. Which ones do you think are superfluous? Scottish Red Ensign can go if you like; there are already several Scottish flags on the page. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Why did you remove the crossed swords? You say it is 'a bit of a stretch', but it seems a reasonable example of having elements in saltire. I found it by browsing "What links here". All the other images are of saltire crosses, so by all means propose another in saltire example in its place. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 22:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Re-added it, per your suggestion. I think the amount of pictures are overwhelming the text in this article, but I did what I thought reasonable to shrink them/reorganize them a bit. I'm still not real happy with the TOC/St. Alba/in saltire mash-up at the top of the page... -- nae'blis
"the amount of pictures are overwhelming the text"- it seems to be a visual topic, which is why I proposed the gallery. I agree- you did a reasonable, in fact good job, of reorganising. Nothing mashes up on my screen after your changes - I expect you have a different window shape and font size. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 22:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The sex thing

I would suggest it be broken out into a separate article again (as people have noted below that it was once a separate article). I just did a bit of research into the matter and several dictionaries clearly differentiate between saltire meaning an X-shaped item of heraldry and St. Andrew's Cross meaning a physical X-shaped cross structure. Googling around, it seems the BDSM community rarely if ever uses the word saltire, preferring St. Andrew's Cross. (See [1]) They may share a shape, but heraldry and a physical wooden structure are different things used for different purposes and probably deserve separate articles. IdahoEv 16:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Does it really need to be there? It seems sort of tasteless. The main article is sort of a sordid heraldry thing, and then there's this hardcore sex tool thrown in for jollies. I recommend it be put into a seperate article, and maybe put a disambig on top. --Pewpewlazers 01:59, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

The BDSM saltire used to have its own article, although it was really too short. Someone proposed the merger on September 14, and a few weeks later, after no objections were received, I merged it with Saltire. The word saltire is not ambiguous, so does not need disambiguation—the sex thing is just a type of saltire, just as the railway and road signage is. If it ever gets its own article again, it still deserves a mention here, not a disambiguation. The photo has no nudity, so it is not usual to call it hardcore. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 16:11, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
It just seems sort of... weird. I'm not offended or anything, but just because it's a homonym and only really distantly related, doesn't mean it should be on the same page. It's better to leave it as a stub on another page and have a link at the top of the page for people who are looking for that sort of thing.--Pewpewlazers 22:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
The stub would have to repeat the legend about Saint Andrew, which arguably lowers the taste even further. Here it avoids repetition. It is not a homonym: like all other saltires, it is so-called because of its shape. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
A sordid heraldry thing?? —Tamfang 20:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey! Where'd it go? :( --ZBrisk 21:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

An anonymous editor cut that section, with no edit summary and no comment here; not good practice. I've restored it (though I didn't restore the reference in the intro paragraph, which might have been more detailed than necessary). I agree with Hrothulf's comments above. Though some readers will find it "weird", it's hardly "distantly related", since these days I think virtually every instance of this design (the three-dimensional object, not the heraldic symbol) is in fact used for just that purpose. ←Hob 02:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC) [whoops, I just made an anonmyous edit of my own! but that was me.]

I just reverted an other anonymous edit.--Nemissimo II 19:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Although Wikipedia is not censored, it is still an encyclopedia and its content should be attributed to verifiable sources which place the BDSM St Andrew's Cross within a general encyclopedic context and which document the claims made about its popularity, etc. Since the BDSM device is clearly a derivative of the traditional means of Saint Andrew's martyrdom, I think we editors should focus on documenting that tradition so that the sex device is described adequately by a short reference rather than a full description. Surely a classical depiction of Andrew's martyrdom would more effectively demonstrate the concept in a general context, and I would tend to place it with the introduction rather than in a "gallery of saltires" which is clearly for heraldic uses. --Dystopos 00:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
  • The use of saltier in BDSM is quite common worldwide, its even nearly considered a symbol to this scene. To ignore this is clearly POV. If you believe the religious use should be portrait in more details ... just go for it.. its a wiki. But the fact that there are other uses doesn't eliminate the fact that these items are used in the BDSM-community worldwide as tools. --Nemissimo II 22:13, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
    • If that is the case there should be no problem finding good sources for your claims. The only POV I am pushing here is that the BDSM use is derivative of the religious iconography. If the BDSM usage has an independent derivation (physiological, perhaps?) then that should be documented. If not, then the description under this heading should, I believe, be kept short. --Dystopos 23:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
      • Whats with with the skanky BDSM pic? This is why nobody takes wiki serious. @nt1-H3r0 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.246.232.20 (talk) 08:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
        • Personally, I would say that the use of the St Andrew's Cross in BDSM is a lot more derivative of the original use of crosses, that is, punishment, rather than the religious context. It is more a Roman use of a cross than a Christian one. It is thus my opinion that if discussion of BDSM use of St Andrew's Crosses is to be part of a larger article, rather than a stub of its own, it would be better placed in the section on modern uses in the article on crucifixion. As things now stand, there is absolutely NO discussion of BDSM uses of such crosses in the article, but Saint Andrew's Cross (BDSM) still redirects to it. It does not make sense to redirect to this page and then completely ignore the topic.Cadrac 02:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fetish Community (Revisited)

Is someone willing to clean up the references to the cross' use in fetish circles? I think that if the wiki article on leather references leather fetishism and rock&roll stars; and if the article on Crisco references it's use as sexual lubricant (exclusively outside of North America, I might add) there is no reason why there cannot be a subsection in this subject (I readded the paragraph earlier today). Here is a link to a website which sells the crosses: http://www.masterrsdungeons.com/products.php?cat=26 Kurtto 04:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Back in April, an experienced editor tagged the fetish/BDSM paragraphs as uncited, and in May, they deleted them according to policy. New material on this topic is more likely to stay if it has references that meet the norms of WP:CITE Wikipedia:Verifiability . --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 15:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sovereign Scotland?

There is no citation for the following line about the flag of Scotland:
It is the oldest continuously used sovereign flag in the world, having been in use since 732 AD.

I think the claim is incorrect because of the following information found on the Wikipedia Scotland entry:

The Kingdom of Scotland was an independent state until 1 May 1707, when the Acts of Union (despite widespread protest across Scotland)[7] resulted in a union with the Kingdom of England to create the Kingdom of Great Britain.[8][9] Scotland's legal system continues to be separate from those of England, Wales, and Northern Ireland; and Scotland still constitutes a discrete jurisdiction in public and in private law.[10] The continued independence of Scots law, the Scottish education system, and the Church of Scotland have all contributed to the continuation of Scottish culture and Scottish national identity since the Union.[11] However, Scotland is no longer a separate sovereign state and does not have independent membership of either the United Nations or the European Union.

--Mrdarius 00:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The physical cross

Is there information on the physical implement used, instead of just the symbol? This used to exist in a seperate article, IIRC, called X cross - which used to cross-link to Saltire, so people who didn't know what that type of cross was called, could find the correct name. The only non-symbol reference remaining in this article is "Saint Andrew is said to have been martyred on such a cross." and the link to BDSM fetish furniture.
~ender 2007-01-13 08:29:AM MST