User talk:Sakredfire

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Sakredfire, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  –Sommers (Talk) 11:54, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tips

Thanks again for contributing to Wikipedia, but I have a few tips for you. First, put your signature (~~~~) only on talk pages, not in articles. Second, do not create nonsense or joke articles, as you did at Everything (all)—repeating this kind of behavior may be construed as vandalism. Please let me know by adding a message to my user talk page if you have any questions, and happy editing! –Sommers (Talk) 11:54, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 11:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Bias in deletion

Dear Sakredfire, The Guptas of today and the Gupta Dynasty are two different things. Guptas of today are vaishyas, but the people of Gupta Dynasty were not Vaishyas. They were kshatriyas. The historians who proved them to be Jats have been mentioned in this discussion. It is not my view but of the historians who have written so. I do not accuse John Hill for this. My point was on bias in deletion. Deletion leads to loss of Data. You can add fresh points counter to my points. It is welcome. It should be with suitable sources. It is surprizing on history part that they know everything about Guptas and Mauryas except their origin. It is this point we are searching. Thanks, burdak 17:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

But what is failed to be mentioned is that these historians have not proven that they were Jatts or Kshatriyas at all. These are all theories and brainstorming by a handful of Jatt historians whop sadly keep exaggerating ancient histories for us, obviously not proud of what we have today.

Sakredfire, please continue with your work, the facts must be shown to be facts and distortions of history to be shown as so.--Mein hoon don 13:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)