User talk:Saibod

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Better late than never; welcome!

Welcome!


Hello, Saibod, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck or looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Help Desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing!

If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page!

Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages:


Best of luck to you, and happy editing!

– Luna Santin (talk) 09:51, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the warm reception :) - Saibod 10:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] R/QM

I was under the impression that the subject needed some direct addressing, rather than leaving it to a different article - and did my best to state the overall issue - as its often enough represented as a kind of dichotomy. Its fair enough to state the problem is focused on the issue of gravity, so if a better treatment is found at QG, then a plain redirect might be in order. IIRC some of it may have been broken off from another article, though IDRW. But I dont really have an interest in it, and I would defer the article to others more qualified. Regards, -Stevertigo 22:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Well then I leave it in your able hands. :) I appreciate the note though. Happy editing. -Stevertigo 22:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

Hello saibod, I am kinda new to wikipedia and I must say that your user page is very very impressive..... I copied some of your links and and used them on my user page. As I am new to wikipedia you will find my home page full of copy paste work:D Never the less I am learning from it :D Anyway..keep up the good work. Yourdeadin 09:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Yourdeadin

[edit] Got it

I was kinding reading the FAQ's and was looking at the Cheatsheet ;) The impressive page you said was ...by my standards too cluttered :p...Sour grapes! Thanks for the Userboxes .Lots of reading to do before I start editing !!! Thanks dear Yourdeadin 09:42, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Yourdeadin

[edit] Ef

A tag has been placed on Ef (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Clicketyclack 11:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 20:08, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removal Of Warning

Hi, I was just woundering why you removed your warning from 81.109.6.186 's talk page? He has vandalised the page again, and there for I have issued him with a final warning. Just wounding if there is any reason why you feel I shoudant do this? Thanks! Tiddly Tom 22:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, well my warning seemed to be basically a duplicate of yours because it referred to the same edit by the user, that made on 22:31. So far my practice was to issue just a single warning for edits made within a short time span, but I guess that's just personal preference. - Saibod 23:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Thats fine, and right. I thought you were refering to a diffrent edit of his. Tiddly Tom 10:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)