Talk:Saint Ignatius' College, Riverview

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.	Schools Portal
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating within Schools. Please rate the article.

Portal	Saint Ignatius' College, Riverview is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
B	This article has been rated as B-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Housemaster's Names

I wonder whether it is necessary to state the names of the housemasters - the names are irrelevant. Jpeob 09:31, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

I disagree, I think it is important to document these things, to expand the article fully —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.146.15.20 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 19 June 2006.

[edit] Preferred Futures

added them.Jpeob 01:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] we and you should?

This article has been written using language in the second person which makes reading the article feels like an advert and as if it is being promoted by wikipedia. the article whould be written in the third person to remobe these ambiguaties and to bring the page in to a more professional article.84.66.55.218 20:37, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

I disagree. The only place where it says "we" in the article is in the "Preferred futures" section. Even so, every time "we" is used here, it is used within a quotation where someone is talking using that terminology. Further, there is no use of "you should" at all across the article. This article, while comprehensive, is plainly not an advert. Cheers, Jpeob 03:20, 21 July 2006 (UTC)