Talk:Saganaki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Greece, an attempt to expand, improve and standardize the content and structure of articles related to Greece.
If you would like to participate, you can improve Saganaki, or sign up and contribute in a wider array of articles like those on our to do list. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
??? This article has not yet been prioritized.

Contents

[edit] Opa!

Shouting "opa" while preparing a saganaki would sound as cheesy to a native Greek as as shouting "Yeeeeeeeeee-ha!" while flipping pancakes would to a Texan! Rastapopoulos 13:32, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Oh, totally. But what can you do? ;) --Iustinus 20:10, 16 December 2005 (UTC) (and nice play on words there, btw)

[edit] American Saganaki

I believe the article is flawed; american saganaki is pan fried, and then doused with brandy and lit at the table. The fire is not the only cooking done. I will correct it, but if you see an issue with my corrections then feel free to expand upon them.

Honestly, I don't know offhand, so I'll let your changes stand unless someone knows better. --Iustinus 03:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Liakouras

A citation was requestion for the attribution of flaming saganaki to Chris Liakouras. I have added a link to the same article someone added to Chris Liakouras: [1]. Now this citation has its problems: first of all, it seems to imply that he invented saganaki period, but I think a careful reading of the article shows that this is just a confusion between flaming saganaki, and the original Greek recipe. The second problem is that this is just one example, when the article refers to a trend. Should I change the citation to a footnote, something like <ref>For example: [2]</ref>, or is it OK as it stands? --Iustinus 23:31, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] formaella in arachova

that is pure conjecture isn't it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hotspury (talkcontribs) 23:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)