Talk:Sacca

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Buddhism This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. Please participate by editing the article Sacca, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has not been rated for quality and/or importance yet. Please rate the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

I'm glad to see this article, but I wonder if this long quote from Bhikkhu Bodhi is the way to go. I'd prefer to use some shorter quotes, do a bit of original writing to flesh it out a bit more, and then provide some links to different works which cover this topic. (Hard to top Bhikkhu Bodhi's Noble Eightfold Path, but I think there are also some good pieces out there.)

I'm gonna work on it below for a while before I copy it to the actual article Obhaso 07:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Proposed Edit

(second paragraph)

It is said that in the course of the training for enlightenment over many lifetimes, a bodhisatta can break all the moral precepts except the stricture of truthfulness. The centrality of this training is due to the nature of Enlightenment in the Buddhist tradition being a profound commitment to the truth of Nature (Dhamma). Without a commitment to Truth, Enlightenment is impossible.

"Much more than an ethical principle, devotion to truthful speech is a matter of taking our stand on reality rather than illusion, on the truth grasped by wisdom rather than the fantasies woven by desire."
-Bhikkhu Bodhi
I’d like to leave the Bhikkhu Bodhi quote intact. I find it hard to be as articulate as Bhikkhu Bodhi and the distribution agreement at Access to Insight is that the text is not to be changed:

http://www.accesstoinsight.org/faq.html#reformat There is also this guideline:

Wikipedia:No_original_research
The article is a stub and would be improved by adding rather than deleting content. I look forward to the fruits of your research. Thanks for listening. Dhammapal 11:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)