User talk:Sabre23t

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome to the 'pedia Sabre! --User:maveric149

Thanks for the welcome, maveric. It's nice to know you're not alone. I hope you don't mind me trying to contact you (or others) when the new things to learn here gets overwhelming. Hmm ... Your [m:maveric149|here] link seems not to work.
I'm slowly going through the welcome page and those linked to it. And will move this to User Talk namespace later. --sabre23t
Moved from main page --sabre23t 02:12, 1 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Finally the cookie bugs has been exterminated and I can login today February 6, 2002. --Sabre23t

[edit] Coca-Cola

Thanks for the nice edit to the Coca Cola page (phosporic acid section) - I moved your exact phrasing into the Pepsi article. I have been having problems with User:chocolateboy repeatedly deleting this section in its entirety, regardless of phrasing. Your assistantce in maintaining this paragraph will be appreciated - perhaps he will back off when he sees that someone else has worked on this section. Leonard G. 04:27, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Noted. :-) Though, I do think that Phosphoric acid in food needs some citation, and may be expanded to its own article. See also: Talk:Coca-Cola#Phosphoric acid and its effects on bone calcium -- sabre23t 04:49, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Klang Valley

Nope, I live more to the south, although right now I'm spending most of my time to the north... and you might also known me as gn0sis from E2! Jpatokal 07:10, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Ah, neighbours across the Selat Tebrau. If you stop over in your journey from south to north, drop me a line for a teh tarik or something. ;-) If you read my last few writings on E2, you'd see I haven't been active there for quite a while, more active on ODP. -- sabre23t 07:45, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Boo

Boo! Ambi 09:26, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Booyah. hehe. sabre23t 09:29, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Haven't seen you on #odp in a while. Ambi 09:32, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Can only do 2 out of 3 things; odp, wikipedia or #odp. And I've been doing a bit of wiki'ing the last few weeks. Mmm, isn't there a nice forum for wikipedians, other than the village pump? sabre23t 09:51, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] NPOVing Anwar Ibrahim

I noticed you've been active in editing Malaysian political articles recently, and was wondering if you could help balance out Anwar Ibrahim. I've placed the NPOV-dispute notice there as a result of several glaring omissions from the article about the government's point of view, Anwar's critics' point of view, and just about anyone's view except those who support Anwar. I've tried to NPOV it, but my edits are hampered by a lack of in-depth knowledge on Anwar and the claims of his critics. For more on the claims, you can see Talk:Anwar Ibrahim. Johnleemk | Talk 10:09, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Okay I had a peep at that Anwar Ibrahim, didn't see anything too glaring I'd like to add or tone down. Anyway, more on its talk page. --- sabre23t 13:17, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Malaysia coat of arms

Thanks Sabre23t, please go to my reply. --Garlics82 02:40, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Malaysia to do

Would greatly appreciate it if you could help or add to the great Malaysia to do list on

[edit] Question on Tan Sri Vincent Tan

Sabre, if you know about ancestors about the respected Tan Sri Vincent Tan Chee Yioun, please write it in my discussion page: User:Chan Han Xiang. Thank You.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Malaysian_wikipedians%27_notice_board --Malbear 14:05, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Article Licensing

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2
I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

[edit] Image:SMS0386 RM1 front s.jpg

This photo has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images (April 18). Thuresson 15:29, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Responded at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images#Phase 1 April 18th. sabre23t 11:08, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image:SMS0418 Mahathir c.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:SMS0418 Mahathir c.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

[edit] Image:Dsai 260304.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Dsai 260304.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

[edit] Image:SMS0437 KLIA control tower s.jpg

Hello, I've just uploaded your picture onto the Commons. Since you've forgot to add a licence, I added gfdl. Is that OK? -- Scriberius

No prob, GFDL is okay for that photo I took. sabre23t 11:38, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Anwar_Ibrahim_and_child_20040326.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anwar_Ibrahim_and_child_20040326.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 11:48, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Anwar_Ibrahim_and_police_20020207.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anwar_Ibrahim_and_police_20020207.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:14, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:SMS0418 Mahathir c.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:SMS0418 Mahathir c.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 17Drew 02:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Digger-level2.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Digger-level2.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Digger-mainscreen.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Digger-mainscreen.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it may be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:59, 25 February 2008 (UTC)