Talk:S7G reactor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the S7G reactor article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Ships (Rated Stub-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. Stub rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale Low rated as Low-importance on the assessment scale Military history WikiProject     (Rated Stub-Class) This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Maritime warfare task force Military technology and engineering task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force WikiProject Energy     (Rated Stub-Class) Energy Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, which collaborates on articles related to energy. Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within energy. Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Reactor Operator

I stumbled on these Navy reactor pages by accident and found the information interesting. I was part of the original crew with MARF, going from initial testing of the new instrumentation for those reactor pumps, initial fuel loading, etc. I was the Reactor Operator who took the reactor critical for the first time and did scram testing from 50% and 100% power. Fun stuff back then!

Stbunten 04:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Steve Bunten

I qualified MO and ELT on MARF before going to Trident Design School across the lot at the S8G prototype. Thanks for the correction to my explanation of the tubes (gadolinium instead of hafnium) — I was working from twenty-some-year-old memory. Where did you after lighting off the MARF? ➥the Epopt 04:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply! Well, mine is 30+ year memories but having worked on it from the start I remembered that Hafnium wasn't used for control so I had to look up what else was used for neutron absorption and when I saw gadolinium I knew that was it. I left MARF prior to it ever getting students so never got to teach, leaving in May 1977. First I went to the USS Tunny (SSN682) out of Charlston that got transfered to Hawaii. After being there, I asked for a transfer to the USS R.E.Lee (SSBN601) as RC Division LPO. After getting out in '81 I went to college getting a degree in Computer Engineering and been living in Colorado since '85. Stbunten 04:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Steve Bunten

We missed by a little over two years then. I was at MARF in the winter of 1979-1980, then went to Groton in the initial increment of PCU No Name (SSBN-728), then went to sea on the first patrol of Ohio Blue. Out in '83, a year in civvie nuke plants (scary!), and now a Los-Angeles-based contractor working with NNPI. Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope to see your name in lots of article histories. ➥the Epopt 05:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

There have been a lot of stories going around the fleet about how the MARF plant came into being, the most prevalent saying that Rickover came up with the design after his Halfnium supplier wanted to jack up the price of components for control rods. Basically, he implemented the design to prove that he could run a safe, stable Naval Reactor without Halfnium control rods as a way of proving them wrong. Anybody know if there's any truth to this story? BTW, I'm a nuke EM just off the USS Ronald Reagan (CVN-76). 138.163.0.46 03:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

That is an interesting story and could well be true but I have to say that I never heard that from anyone while we were building MARF back in the mid-70's. I am amazed that even at this time there are folks in the Navy who even know anything about MARF 30+ years after it first went critical! It was an interesting concept--we used to say that you "flush the reactor" instead of the typical "scram". Stbunten 19:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC) Steve Bunten