User talk:S. M. Sullivan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I am truly sorry if you are leaving Wikipedia. I did not intentionally lie about you. Perhaps I was too flippant in a comment your read and you misinterpreted it. Please accept my apologies if something I have said is the reason you are leaving. Or, preferably, don't leave and work with us. Sincerely, --Mattisse 17:45, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Also, I did not call you a sock puppet and I do not think you are a sock puppet, so you did misunderstand that part. I feel that you are a real human being. --Mattisse 17:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey mister, knock it off and continue editing. Or what's happening? Misou 04:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

And, you were incredibly gracious in your agreement to attempt to stem the controversy about the article by simply stopping editing it. This showed that you have the type of civility skills that are sorely needed on the Web and Wikipedia. Please reconsider the situation. People were irresponsible in what they said to you about a rather heated article. The article was problematic, but the content itself was researched and appropriate for an encyclopedia in various articles. There were editing details, but most of my additions to Wikipedia require some work. What's more important is that when things got heated, and when people were irresponsibly being uncivil to you personally, you were willing to do something to take the heat off. I doubt you're a sock puppet, because you couldn't even be bothered to troll when you would have been fully justified in doing so. Consider the situation, please. KP Botany 05:05, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Electroconvulsive therapy controversy

An article that you have been involved in editing, Electroconvulsive therapy controversy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electroconvulsive therapy controversy. Thank you. Staug73 14:49, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

I nominated this article because controversial aspects of a treatment belong in a main article. For example, your section on mortality and morbidity really belongs in the main article.Staug73 14:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rupa Ganguly

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Rupa Ganguly, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:09, 9 March 2008 (UTC)