Talk:S2G reactor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the S2G reactor article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Ships (Rated Stub-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome. Stub rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale Low rated as Low-importance on the assessment scale Military history WikiProject     (Rated Stub-Class) This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Maritime warfare task force Military technology and engineering task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force WikiProject Energy     (Rated Stub-Class) Energy Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, which collaborates on articles related to energy. Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within energy. Help with this template This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Inherent problems?

Current article reads Due to inherent problems with the concept, the Seawolf was later converted with a S2Wa Nautilus-type pressurized water reactor. That's consistent with what the S1G reactor article says, but not what the article on USS Seawolf (SSN-575) says: ADM Rickover had planned all along to standardize submarine reactor power plants. My understanding has always been that both concepts appeared sound, but Rickover chose the PWR. Andrewa 09:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)