Súmate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Súmate (Spanish for "Join Up") is a Venezuelan volunteer civil association founded in 2002 by María Corina Machado and Alejandro Plaz.

Contents

[edit] Mission and values

Súmate is a non-governmental organization (NGO) whose stated aim is to promote the free exercise of citizen's political rights, and the discussion of matters of public interest. The group's mission is to promote, defend, facilitate, and back the political rights accorded to citizens by the Constitution of Venezuela.

Súmate's espoused values are:

  • The guarantee of civil and political freedom and rights
  • Impartial and independent citizen participation in democratic processes
  • Professional volunteerism with a high level of citizen participation
  • Organizational transparency and efficacy

Other projects are the consolidation of a national network of volunteers; analysis of voter registration; planning and execution of parallel vote counts to strengthen confidence in electoral processes; and educational programs.

[edit] History

George W. Bush welcomes María Corina Machado, a founder of Súmate, to the Oval Office on May 31, 2005
George W. Bush welcomes María Corina Machado, a founder of Súmate, to the Oval Office on May 31, 2005

Hugo Chávez was elected President of Venezuela in 1998. Participation was 64%, with 36% of the electorate abstaining, resulting in a Chávez victory with 35% of the total electorate. In 1999 a new Constitution of Venezuela was approved, making Chávez eligible to run for president again in 2000, for a six-year term; and again in 2006, for another six years. This could result in a Chávez presidency of 14 years, compared to the previous presidential term limit of five years. He won the 2000 election with 60% of the votes cast, 33% of the total electorate, and 44% abstention.

These changes were made to the Constitution and electoral processes based on elections with an overwhelmingly support for Chávez[1] but unprecedented voter abstention[2]—a "poor showing"[3] with most staying away from the polls.[1][4]

Hugo Chávez's Election Results
— 1998 presidential election —
Candidate Votes  %
Chávez: 3,673,685 56%
Salas: 2,613,161 40%
Valid votes: 6,537,304 —
Abstention: 3,971,239 36%
Hugo Chávez's Election Results
— 1999 referendum —
Enact the new constitution?
Option Votes  %
Yes: 3,301,475 72%
No: 1,298,105 28%
Abstention: 6,041,743 56%
Hugo Chávez's Election Results
— 2000 presidential election —
Candidate Votes  %
Chávez: 3,757,773 60%
Arias: 2,359,459 38%
Valid votes: 6,288,578 —
Abstention: 5,120,464 44%


Súmate was founded with an expressed goal of achieving a high level of citizen participation in Venezuelan elections. According to The Washington Post, Machado and Plaz had a hurried encounter in a hotel lobby in 2001, where they shared their concern about the course that was being shaped for Venezuela. Machado said, "Something clicked. I had this unsettling feeling that I could not stay at home and watch the country get polarized and collapse.... We had to keep the electoral process but change the course, to give Venezuelans the chance to count ourselves, to dissipate tensions before they built up. It was a choice of ballots over bullets."[5]

According to The Wall Street Journal, Súmate is not concerned with who governs, but the Venezuelan democracy.[6]

Súmate was originally composed of a group of professionals, but now has grown to include 30,000 volunteers from across Venezuela and all walks of life.[5]

[edit] Recall referendum, 2004

Further information: Venezuelan recall referendum of 2004

In 2003, Súmate organized a campaign to force a recall referendum revoking the remainder of the term in office of President Chávez, as provided for under Article 72 of the Constitution of Venezuela, which permits citizens to request a recall if signatures are collected from 20% of the electorate.

Hugo Chávez's Election Results
— 2004 recall referendum —
Recall Hugo Chávez?
Source: CNE data
Candidate Votes  %
No: 5,800,629 59%
Yes: 3,989,008 41%
Non-voting: 4,222,269 30%

The recall vote was held on August 15, 2004. A record number of voters turned out but the recall was defeated with a 59% "no" vote.[7] The Carter Center concluded the results were accurate,[8] but European Union observers did not oversee the referendum, saying too many restrictions were put on their participation by the government.[9]

A Penn, Schoen & Berland Associates (PSB) exit poll predicted that Chávez would lose by 20%, whereas the election results showed him to have won by 20%. Schoen commented, "I think it was a massive fraud".[10] PSB used Súmate personnel as fieldworkers. Publication or broadcast of exit polls was banned by electoral authorities, but results of the PSB poll went out to media outlets and opposition offices several hours before polls closed.[11]

Following the recall vote, Súmate requested that Ricardo Hausmann of Harvard University and Roberto Rigobón of MIT perform a statistical analysis analyzing how fraud could have occurred during the referendum. They concluded that the vote samples audited by the government were not a random representation of all precincts and that opposition witnesses and international observers were not allowed near the computer hub on election day.[9][12][13][14] CEPR, a liberal think tank[15] based in Washington, reports that other economists have called the Harvard/MIT assumptions about how the alleged fraud was conducted unlikely.[13][16] According to CBS News, Chávez branded the leaders of Súmate, a vote-monitoring group, as "conspirators, coup plotters and lackeys of the U.S. government".[17] After the referendum, members of Súmate were charged with treason and conspiracy, violating Article 132, for receiving financial support for their activities from the NED. The trial has been postponed several times.

The criminal charges triggered concern from Human Rights Watch[18] and the NED-related World Movement for Democracy. The latter accused the Government of Venezuela of illegally "withholding case files from the defendants, using depositions of the defendants that were made before the charges against them were known, and refusing to accede to requests of the Supreme Court in the case."[19] Tom Casey, acting spokesman for the State Department, expressed disappointment about the court's decision to try the founders and said the charges were "without merit."[20]

Over 70 democrats, including prominent world leaders, wrote to Chávez on November 11, 2004, pointing out that "proceeding against nongovernmental organizations for receiving democratic assistance is a violation of both the Inter-American Democratic Charter and the Warsaw Declaration of the Community of Democracies, a document your government signed along with over 100 others four years ago." The letter indicated that the prosecution, "as well as the proposal to criminalize democracy assistance from abroad" are both "clearly inconsistent with international democratic norms and constitute a grave threat to democracy." Signatories of the letter included Czech President Vaclav Havel, former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, U.S. Senator John McCain, former Canadian Prime Minister Kim Campbell, former Nicaraguan President Violeta Chamorro, former Prime Minister of Bulgaria Philip Dimitrov, and Richard Goldstone, former prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.[21]

[edit] Presidential elections, 2006

See also: Venezuelan presidential election, 2006

Súmate recommended procedures for a primary, to be held on August 13, 2006, to choose the opposition candidate for the December 3, 2006 presidential elections.[22] Teodoro Petkoff, a Chávez critic, said that Súmate's procedure was authoritarian, comparing it to the Carmona Decree.[23] Nine other candidates agreed to the terms for holding a primary, confirming their desire to allow the citizens to choose the opposition candidate. Another candidate condemned Petkoff's remarks against Súmate, saying that Petkoff's statements didn't help the country, and explaining that the conditions for holding a primary had been previously discussed between all of the candidates, including Petkoff.[24][25] On August 9, Súmate announced that the August 13 primary election would not be held, since the candidates had decided to back Manuel Rosales as the single opposition candidate. Machado said that the primary "initiative accomplished its goal and that Súmate would continue working to ensure clean elections and respect for citizens' rights."[26]

On 8 December 2006, Súmate announced that their count and audits of the final election results matched the official count of the Venezuelan National Electoral Council, that showed a landslide victory for Hugo Chávez, highlighting that "balloting was not clean, transparent or reliable."[27] Machado said the Government had stacked the odds against the opposition in the pre-election period, including "a climate of collective intimidation" due to the use of fingerprint-reading machines and an unaudited register of voters, and that if irregularities had been corrected, they could have impacted the final result. She clarified that the impact could not be assessed, saying "We will know only the truth about what Venezuelans really feel, the day when clean elections are held in Venezuela."[27]

[edit] Impartiality

A rally in favor of the "yes" option in the 2004 recall referendum against Hugo Chávez in the capital, Caracas.
A rally in favor of the "yes" option in the 2004 recall referendum against Hugo Chávez in the capital, Caracas.

Critics say that Súmate is not an impartial organization. Súmate describes itself as a civil association[28] not concerned with who governs, but the Venezuelan democracy.[6]

Other sources describe Súmate as an election or vote-monitoring group,[29][30][17] a civic organization or civic society,[30][5][31][18] a voting rights organization,[32] an NGO or Venezuela's largest nongovernmental organization,[33][34][18] a "nongovernmental organization resisting efforts by President Hugo Chavez's to turn Venezuela into a dictatorship",[6] a Venezuelan group that helped organize the recall initiative,[11] an organization that mobilized petitioners for the recall of Chavez,[35] a pro-democracy nonprofit group,[36] a volunteer organization of democracy activists,[37] and a watchdog group or election watchdog organization.[33][38]

Juan Forero of The New York Times referred to Súmate as an anti-Hugo Chavez election-monitoring organization,[39] and an antigovernment group.[40] The BBC has referred to Sumate at least three times as an "opposition group".[41][42][43] Venezuela’s El Universal consistently refers to Súmate as an NGO,[44] but has called it an opposition NGO in the past.[12] The Christian Science Monitor says of Machado, “a friend invited her to create a pro-democracy group”, but adds that Larry Birns, director of the liberal Council on Hemispheric Affairs in Washington says that Sumate's "pro-democracy pretensions are ... a front for its anti-Chávez goals".[45]

[edit] Other controversy

Critics say that Machado supported the 2002 coup attempt. Venezuelan newspaper El Nacional reports that María Corina Machado's signature is among 352 signatures on the Carmona Decree.[46] Following the brief ouster of Chávez on April 11, 2002, this decree dissolved the National Assembly (democratically elected under Chávez), the Supreme Tribunal of Justice and other institutions in order to hold new elections, re-establish the constitutional thread, and enact Article 350 of the Constitution of Venezuela which says the People of Venezuela shall disown any regime, legislation or authority that violates democratic values, principles and guarantees or encroaches upon human rights.[47][48] According to The Christian Science Monitor, Machado says she had visited the presidential palace and wrote her name on what she thought was a sign-in sheet.[45]

Súmate and others have denounced the government for using the list of signers of the recall petition in violation of privacy and electoral laws. Luis Tascón, a member of the National Assembly representing Chávez' party (Fifth Republic Movement - MVR) and the Communist Party of Venezuela of Táchira state, under orders from Chávez to collect copies of signatures of the petitioners for the recall referendum, published on his website the identities of over 2,400,000 signers.[49] Súmate alleged violation of privacy and electoral laws, considering reports that people who worked for the government were fired, denied work, or denied the issuance of official documents because of their appearance on the list.[49] It is reported in summer 2006 that Venezuelan prosecutors have brought conspiracy charges against the leaders of Súmate. The pro-Chavez National Assembly is preparing to require nonprofit groups to reveal their funding sources.

[edit] Personnel

Plaz is a Venezuelan engineer and management consultant, who holds three Master’s degrees (two from Stanford University), and was a Senior partner for McKinsey & Company in Latin America, before taking a leave of absence to co-found Súmate. Machado was hailed as "the best of womankind and the difficult times many women face around the globe" on a list of Women the World Should Know for International Women's Day.[36]

Luis Enrique Palacios and Ricardo Estévez are also charged with complicity in treason and conspiracy.[18]

[edit] See also

v • d • e
Hugo Chávez
Biography
Political events
Elections
Governance
Bolivarian Missions
Reactions

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ a b Gutkin, Steven. Venezuelans back revising constitution. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (April 26, 1999). Retrieved on 2007-08-02.
  2. ^ Venezuela risk: Political stability risk. Economist Intelligence Unit (July 25, 2007). Retrieved on 2007-08-02.
  3. ^ Serge F. Kovaleski. Venezuelan Voters Make President More Powerful; The Washington Post. Washington, D.C.: December 16, 1999. pg. A.30
  4. ^ Serge F. Kovaleski. Venezuelans Approve Plan For Assembly; Vote Favors Chavez Wish To Rewrite Constitution; The Washington Post. Washington, D.C.: April 26, 1999. pg. A.11 "But the turnout today was a sharp contrast to the presidential election on December 6 when 65 percent of the country's registered voters cast ballots. In the capital, Caracas, where there were no reports of violence or voting irregularities, only short lines were seen at many balloting stations, where voters could pick 'yes' or 'no' on whether a constituent assembly was needed and on proposed guidelines for the election of its members."
  5. ^ a b c Boustany, Nora. Signing On To Challenge Hugo Chavez. The Washington Post. Washington, D.C.: July 9, 2004. p. A.15
  6. ^ a b c O'Grady, Mary A. A Young Defender of Democracy Faces Chávez's Wrath. Wall Street Journal. June 10, 2005; Page A9.
  7. ^ BBC News. (BBC, 21 September 2004). "Venezuelan Audit Confirms Victory". Retrieved 5 November 2005.
  8. ^ Carter Center (2005). Observing the Venezuela Presidential Recall Referendum: Comprehensive Report. Accessed 25 January 2006.
  9. ^ a b de Cordoba, Jose and Luhnow, David. "Venezuelans Rush to Vote on Chavez: Polarized Nation Decides Whether to Recall President After Years of Political Rifts". Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition). New York, NY: August 16, 2004. pg. A11.
  10. ^ Barone, M. "Exit polls in Venezuela". U.S. News & World Report. August 20, 2004.
  11. ^ a b U.S. Poll Firm in Hot Water in Venezuela. Associated Press, Accessed 9 June 2006.
  12. ^ a b Juan Francisco Alonso (September 6 , 2004). Súmate: There is a 99% probability of fraud in referendum. El Universal. Accessed 6 August 2006.
  13. ^ a b Weisbrot M, Rosnick D, Tucker T (September 20, 2004). Black Swans, Conspiracy Theories, and the Quixotic Search for Fraud: A Look at Hausmann and Rigobón's Analysis of Venezuela's Referendum Vote. CEPR: Center for Economic and Policy Research. Accessed 30 June 2006.
  14. ^ Hausmann is married to Ana Julia Jatar, a member of the board of Súmate. Jattar de Hausmann, Ana Julia (2005-11-17). Presentacion de Ana Julia Jatar en el Congreso USA (pdf). Súmate. Retrieved on 2007-01-14.(Spanish) Friends of Harvard Hillel Fall 2002 (pdf) p 22. Riesman Center for Harvard Hillel (2002). Retrieved on 2007-01-14.
  15. ^ Dorell, O. (4/12/2005). Benefit estimates depend on who calculates them. USA Today. Accessed 30 June 2006.
  16. ^ Expressing support for the work of the National Endowment for Democracy in Venezuela. Resolution in the US House of Representatives "the National Endowment for Democracy made a grant to Sumate in the amount of $53,400 for a voter education project in Venezuela". (20 November 2004).
  17. ^ a b Chavez Calls Watchdog Group a Top Enemy. CBS News (3 December 2005).
  18. ^ a b c d Human Rights Watch. Venezuela: Court Orders Trial of Civil Society Leaders. Accessed 8 June 2006.
  19. ^ World Movement for Democracy. Democracy Activists in Venezuela Threatened. (16 July 2004) Accessed 8 June 2006.
  20. ^ Embassy of the United States, Venezuela (July 8, 2005). "Súmate Trial Decision". Accessed 18 June 2006.
  21. ^ National Endowment for Democracy. International Coalition Expresses Concern for Democracy in Venezuela: Havel, Albright, McCain among signatories of letter to Chavez. (11 November 2004). Accessed on August 16, 2006.
  22. ^ Súmate: Las primarias se realizarán el 13 de agosto. El Universal (7 July 2006). (Spanish)
  23. ^ Teodoro Petkoff: "No me inscribiré ni participaré en ese proceso." Globovision (7 July 2006). (Spanish)
  24. ^ Froilán Barrios condenó expresiones de Petkoff. El Universal (7 July 2006). (Spanish)
  25. ^ Súmate announced primaries for August 13th. El Universal (8 July 2006).
  26. ^ Súmate: there will be no primary elections. El Universal (August 8, 2006).
  27. ^ a b Castillo, Vivian. "We will know the truth when we have clean elections". El Universal (8 December 2006). Accessed 10 December 2006.
  28. ^ Súmate: Quienes Somos. Accessed 17 August 2006.
  29. ^ Diehl, Jackson. In Venezuela, Locking Up the Vote; The Washington Post. Washington, D.C.: April 10, 2006. pg. A.17
  30. ^ a b Watch Venezuela; The Washington Post. Washington, D.C.: November 21, 2004. pg. B.06
  31. ^ Luhnow, David; de Cordoba, Jose. Academics' Study Backs Fraud Claim In Chavez Election. Wall Street Journal. New York, N.Y.: September 7, 2004. pg. A.18
  32. ^ Kraul, Chris. THE WORLD; 3 Venezuela Opposition Parties Bow Out; The anti-Chavez groups, alleging irregularities, say they won't take part in legislative elections.; Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles, Calif.: November 30, 2005. pg. A.3
  33. ^ a b O’Grady, Mary Anastasia. Americas: A Young Mayor Dares to Defy the Chavistas. Wall Street Journal. New York, N.Y.: July 29, 2005. pg. A.13
  34. ^ Bush Doctrine, Latin-Style. Wall Street Journal. New York, N.Y.: June 7, 2005. pg. A.14
  35. ^ Lakshmanan, Indira A.R. VENEZUELA OPPOSITION REFUSES TO ADMIT DEFEAT. Boston Globe. Boston, Mass.: August 19, 2004. pg. A.6
  36. ^ a b Women the World Should Know. National Review Online (March 8, 2006).
  37. ^ Tourists And The Two Venezuelas. CBS News (21 May 2006).
  38. ^ Chavez's Party Gets Big Election Victory. CBS News (5 December 2005).
  39. ^ Forero, Juan. Venezuela's Best-Loved, or Maybe Most-Hated, Citizen. New York Times. New York, N.Y.: November 19, 2005. pg. A.4
  40. ^ Forero, Juan. Venezuelan Judge Orders Trial For Chavez Foe Helped by U.S. New York Times. New York, N.Y.: July 8, 2005. pg. A.2
  41. ^ Venezuela 'landslide' for Chavez. BBC News (5 December 2005).
  42. ^ Venezuelan opposition quit poll. BBC News (29 November 2005).
  43. ^ Venezuela to boost poll security. BBC News (7 October 2005).
  44. ^ Súmate announced primaries for August 13th. El Universal (8 July 2006).
  45. ^ a b Ceaser, Mike. Anti-Chávez leader under fire. Christian Science Monitor (July 5, 2005).
  46. ^ Lista de Firmantes del Decreto Carmona. El Nacional (Archivos). Accessed 24 July 2006.
  47. ^ Acta de constitución del Gobierno de Transición Democrática y Unidad Nacional. Venezuela Analítica (April 12, 2002). Retrieved 24 July 2006. (Spanish)
  48. ^ Venezuela to hold elections within year. BBC News (12 April 2002).
  49. ^ a b Embassy of the United States, Caracas, Venezuela. Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2005, Venezuela. Accessed 1 July 2006.

[edit] External links