Talk:Søren Kierkegaard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Skip to table of contents    
Featured article star Søren Kierkegaard is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do.
Main Page trophy This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 11, 2006.
This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
Version 0.5
This article has been selected for Version 0.5 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia.
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:
Other languages WikiProject Echo has identified Søren Kierkegaard as a foreign language featured article. You may be able to improve this article with information from the Korean language Wikipedia.
Archive

Archives


1, 2

Contents

[edit] Seduction theorist?

Should he really be in Category:Seduction theorists? Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 23:33, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pseudonyms

Just for the asking, is there any sense in supposing that his pseudonyms are actualy something more like heteronyms, like those of Fernando Pessoa? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Corrado7mari (talkcontribs) 22:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

If a heteronym is basically just a psuedonym that is a personality that could stand alone, then I guess they are more than just pseudonyms... especially in the second authorshipTeeteringtotter (talk) 06:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Journals

How often did he write in his Journals, what was his habit regarding journal entries? Can someone characterize the journal entries, the length, frequency, style, range of subject matter, degree of personal comment and observation or lack of personal inner-monologues?

If this is for homework, you're going to have to do some research. And if it isn't, those are still a lot of questions. All of those categories varied greatly. If you'd like to see some examples, go to [1] 71.31.150.145 02:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Recording underway

I'm audio recording this article. Is "Aabye" pronounced or-BEE-eh? 64.122.208.184 16:46, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Apparently it's pronounced "AW boo". See this: [2] (look at the bottom of Page 13) FranksValli 19:49, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Remember that the Danes pronounce Kierkegaard with a silent-D, like "Kier-ge-gor" (Check out that OGG file for tips). Also Regine is pronounced "Rah-GEE-na" not "Re-Gene". Hope to hear it soon! Poor Yorick 21:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Part one done and loaded. Others getting recorded. .:DavuMaya:. 08:06, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Do you know when is ready? 87.194.82.148 10:20, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Ja ja ferdig i god tid, part two is almost done, may get part 3 done today. part 1 is currently available. .:DavuMaya:. 21:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Something about his death?

Why is this article mostly about an explanation of SK's philosophy and not about him as an individual? For instance, how about some information about his death? Seems like there is a lot written about the man's ideas in other forums that could better do justice to them than a Wikipedia article and that more words should have been spent on the man. Just an opinion. I do think his death should be spoken about, though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.87.26.131 (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

WP tries not to duplicate material and many times the ideas are combined into the person's biography (ie so we don't have a Kierkegaards philosophies page), in reading/recording the entire article there is a significant amount of his life in this besides his creations, it just appears to be inundated by all the rest. True there is not a lot about his death, I haven't heard though it was all that relevant, perhaps you could source material and edit the page, it's always open to new edits. .:DavuMaya:. 16:54, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Wikiproject scope - Christianity

I just stumbled upon it. But the template on Wikiproject Christianity is listed twice. In one, this article, is rated as having low importance, in the other as high importance. Perhaps it should be correct accordingly to the right status of the article. Poderi (talk) 11:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Corrections needed...

Notable ideas Regarded as the father of Existentialism, angst, existential despair, Three spheres of human existence, knight of faith, <DELETE COMMA/ADD IDEA?

Nemo Senki66.213.22.193 (talk) 23:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)