Talk:Södertälje Municipality

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	The article on Södertälje Municipality is supported by WikiProject Sweden, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

WikiProject Echo has identified Södertälje Municipality as a foreign language featured article. You may be able to improve this article with information from the Swedish language Wikipedia.

The link to Astra Zeneca (Astra Zeneca AB) refers to the Swedish subsidiary of the British entity AstraZeneca plc. Before merging Swedish Astra AB and Britsh Zeneca plc were separate companies. Regarding matters of cooperation with local authorities and conducting research in conjunction with universities in Sweden, the Swedish entity is the legal signatory not the entity of the British public limited company . Changing the link to to AstraZeneca plc, itself a redirect, implies conditions different from the actual mater of fact. -- Mic 10:11, 26 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Chart[er]

I've changed "Chart" to "Charter" in the history section, but I'm not certain I've got that correct. The article appears to be translated and "chart" doesn't really fit. I'm guess it meant "The city had a charter," but I guess it could be "the city appeared on charts (i.e. maps)". If someone can check the Swedish version and confirm for me? tack John (Jwy) 05:22, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

The Swedish version (which is far more detailed than the English one) doesn't mention either term - the time in the town's history is rather late to care about maps (it was burned by the Russian invaders and hit by pestilence); it's been a well-mapped area for the last thousand or so years.... so I don't know what the original author intended. --Alvestrand 18:14, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. John (Jwy) 18:35, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

I wrote it. It should be charter (as in royal charter). / Fred-Chess 18:45, 24 February 2006 (UTC)