User talk:Ryu Gaia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello? One-two, one-two, checka checka checka?

Ryu Gaia 09:50, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Ryu Gaia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

TheRingess 07:58, 26 February 2006 (UTC)


[edit] The Heroes Quest Virtual Series

Hi, welcome to Wikipedia! I was looking over the new page log and found the article that you have been working on. I'm afraid you might be right that it will be deleted for not being notable enough.

If it has been on televison or meantioned in the press then that should be something you should add in :) Also you may want to read our guide on notabilty in fiction. Grandwazir 10:39, 26 February 2006 (UTC)


This may be an odd question, but, would not the article for "Banana Chan," which has been open for quite some while and has had hardly any content in months, be much more suited to be deleted than mine? Whereas mine may be non-notable now, given time, the Heroes' Quest should be considered just as notable as Banana Chan, in terms of length of series and such. I just started an article early. Ryu Gaia 10:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi Ryu, thanks for following procedures for marking the article for deletion - I've now deleted The heroes' quest virtual series. I've tagged Banana Chan with {{prod}}. —Quarl (talk) 2006-02-26 11:08Z
Argh edit conflicts, I was going to say, I agree well spotted, Banana Chan is a good example of a non-notable article. There is very little I could find based on ten minutes of research about the series, and yes properly should be deleted. I'm not denying that maybe in the future, Heroes' Quest might be notable enough for an article but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, it would have to come back when it is.
No one can doubt that your article inself is much more infomative and well written than Banana Chan, but I still don't think it would pass the notabity guidelines. That said I am no expert on internet cartoon series. Grandwazir 11:09, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reasons:

Autoblock of 204.193.6.90 lifted.

Request handled by:  Netsnipe  ►  16:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Syrith.png

Hi. When you uploaded Image:Syrith.png, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}} and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}}. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, and cannot make the image compliant with Wikipedia:Non-free content, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week. All other non-free images must follow these rules.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. Aksibot 07:40, 3 June 2007 (UTC)