Talk:Ruth Moore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
[edit] Important Writer Mistake
Important 20th century writer? Not to degrade Moore's wonderful novels and stories, the author of this paragraph should consider the following questions: Why is Ruth Moore so obscure seven years into the 21st century? (After all, Eudora Welty is still going strong.) Why are Moore's works missing from high school and college reading lists? What aren't emerging young writers compared to Moore? Calling Moore important is an overstatement and should be corrected to "once popular."
- "Important" was meant as a qualifier to "Maine writer" and not "writer." I think it justifiable to characterize her as an important figure in the Maine literary canon; though not the American canon. I agree that it would be more apt to describe her as "popular novelist" of the 1940's and 1950's or her time or the like. Premarun 19:41, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] National Stage?
No real proof is offered that merits placing Ruth Moore on equal footing with the literary giants of the 20th century. By the logic of this paragraph, the very best selling authors according to the NY Times list of the 1940s, such as Betty McDonald ("The Egg and I") and Kathleen Winsor ("Forever Amber"), would also rank among such august company as Orwell, Maugham, and Warren.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Deepwaters.jpg
Image:Deepwaters.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
