Talk:Ruth Handler
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
--83.32.60.138 (talk) 16:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)--83.32.60.138 (talk) 16:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)--83.32.60.138 (talk) 16:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)--83.32.60.138 (talk) 16:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)--83.32.60.138 (talk) 16:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)#REDIRECT [[
Insert text
|
Block quote
]]
I think thispage has a bit too much on Mattel and Barbie, and not enough about Ruth Handler. Am I right?
I think you´re not because hardly anyone would be interested in Ms Handler if she hadn´t created one of 20th century´s icons. 195.179.14.235 14:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
I quite agree! Without doubt she was a remarkable woman but the most remarkable thing in her life was Barbie. 89.51.17.29 19:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
I think that this website is more focused on the barbie doll even though i typed in Ruth Handler! It needs more info on Ruth Handler!! Bold text == me 2 I think it focuses wat 2 much on barbie (eeewww)!!!!!!
[edit] you stupids
you know what she wouldnt have been heard of if it wasnt for the barbie so stop saying theres to much barbie
I THINK THAT I NEED TO KNOW WHAT HER PARENTS NAMES ARE AND WHAT THEY DID FOR A LIVING AND I CAN'T FIND IT ANYWHERE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.128.132.208 (talk) 19:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "Fighting the good fight"?
"Fighting the good fight" is not an appropriate title for a section of an encyclopedia article. ForDorothy (talk) 01:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)