Talk:Ruth Handler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

--83.32.60.138 (talk) 16:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)--83.32.60.138 (talk) 16:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)--83.32.60.138 (talk) 16:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)--83.32.60.138 (talk) 16:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)--83.32.60.138 (talk) 16:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)#REDIRECT [[

Block quote

]]

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

I think thispage has a bit too much on Mattel and Barbie, and not enough about Ruth Handler. Am I right?

I think you´re not because hardly anyone would be interested in Ms Handler if she hadn´t created one of 20th century´s icons. 195.179.14.235 14:16, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

I quite agree! Without doubt she was a remarkable woman but the most remarkable thing in her life was Barbie. 89.51.17.29 19:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

I think that this website is more focused on the barbie doll even though i typed in Ruth Handler! It needs more info on Ruth Handler!! Bold text == me 2 I think it focuses wat 2 much on barbie (eeewww)!!!!!!

[edit] you stupids

you know what she wouldnt have been heard of if it wasnt for the barbie so stop saying theres to much barbie


I THINK THAT I NEED TO KNOW WHAT HER PARENTS NAMES ARE AND WHAT THEY DID FOR A LIVING AND I CAN'T FIND IT ANYWHERE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.128.132.208 (talk) 19:16, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] "Fighting the good fight"?

"Fighting the good fight" is not an appropriate title for a section of an encyclopedia article. ForDorothy (talk) 01:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)