Talk:Russian destroyer Leytenant Zatsarenni

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Vernet's Shipwreck This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, an attempt to improve coverage of shipwreck-related topics. See also the parent WikiProject, WikiProject Disaster Management. If you plan to work on this article for an extended period of time, please indicate what you are doing on the Project's talk page.
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritising and managing its workload.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the Project's importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Ship-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Stub rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale
Mid rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale

[edit] Name

Should the transliteration of the name be changed to "Leitenant"?
—wwoods 17:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

I was thinking about the same thing too, but I chose Лейтенант as it is the current way of spelling. --MoRsE 17:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
I wasn't challenging the Cyrillic, but we've got both "Leytenant Zatsarenni (Russian: Лейтенант Зацаренни) was ..." and "The Leitenant Zatsarenni was rediscovered ...". Consistency would be good, but I've no idea which is better. And that doesn't get into the Zatsarenni/Zatsarenniy thing. :-)
—wwoods 19:30, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Assessment

This article has been automatically assessed for WP:SHIPS as stub-class because there is a stub template on the article page. HausTalk 22:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)