Talk:Russell (locomotive)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list |
||
 |
This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways.
|
||
 |
This article is within the scope of the Locomotives task force. |
Shouldn't this be moved to Russell(WHR Locomotive), for consistancy with other naming conventions? Born Acorn 23:05, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well, I'd say Russell (locomotive) - it has an extra space before the opening parenthesis and isn't specific to the WHR as Russell wasn't always a WHR loco. But apart from that, yes I think it should. Gwernol 23:23, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, that seems about right. Russell (locomotive) would be fitting. Do we need to set up a straw poll? Born Acorn 14:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
