Talk:Rushworth Kidder

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

	Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Additional information: Related task forces (core areas): Ethics Related task forces (major fields): Philosophers

[edit] VfD

Consensus of VfD on 7 March 2005 to keep. Discussion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Rushworth Kidder. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 20:53, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Vanity

After getting suspicious and googling Wikipedia for Kidder references, there seem to be a number of very similarly worded references subtly inserted into a wide variety of ethics-related Wikipedia articles. The ideas associated with Kidder are not sufficiently ground-breaking to warrant this level of attention from Wikipedia. I've removed a few of the references. If anyone thinks that Kidder really is notable, perhaps they could comment below. Thanks. Caravaca 11:03, 11 October 2006 (UTC)