User talk:RuleBrittania

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I havent done anything, I told you on that admins noticeboard that i wouldnt and havent touched the pages of my reverted edits again!! I'm only here to edit health related topics!!! I've only been blocked because of simply wanting to civilly warn MONGO, PLEASE reconsider I haven't vandalised anything!! please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for the place I was reported! Ive apologised for trying to warn MONGO.. again I'm sorry! Can't another admin review not the blocking one! HONESTLY! I haven't done anything wrong, please! --RuleBrittania 11:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)"


Decline reason: "It's clear we're done here. — REDVEЯS 21:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I havent done anything, I told you on that admins noticeboard that i wouldnt and havent touched the pages of my reverted edits again!! I'm only here to edit health related topics!!! I've only been blocked because of simply wanting to civilly warn MONGO, PLEASE reconsider I haven't vandalised anything!! please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for the place I was reported! Ive apologised for trying to warn MONGO.. again I'm sorry! --RuleBrittania 22:13, 3 March 2007 (UTC)"


Decline reason: "You've been determined to be a sockpuppet of a banned user, so request declined. — Majorly (o rly?) 22:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Contents

Fair use rationale for Image:MedalertCar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MedalertCar.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

North Korea

Inserting your own POV into articles and then calling people who disagree with you Right Wing will accomplish nothing. Your additions to that article are speculation, which is not encyclopedic. Furthermore, you claim on your own userpage that you hate Wikipedia, so why are you here? TheQuandry 19:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

North Korea edits

If you believe that an article is biased, please contribute to improving it with sourced, verifiable information, not with editorializing. You may or may not be the same as another user, but your edits are very similar, both in content and in style (e.g. adding pro-NK and anti-American editorializing to articles, and extreme comma splices) to User:NoJoyInMudville. --Reuben 21:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Unprotection

I have no idea when, and am not sure what MONGO will want to do (and incidentally, I'm sure he already knows about AGF). Trebor 18:55, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Provide a diff, or contact the Administrators' noticeboard. -- ReyBrujo 21:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Blocked

This user is a sock puppet of Frogsprog, and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to contributions for evidence.

Account information: block logcurrent autoblockseditslogs