Talk:Rule of Three (Wiccan)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of WikiProject Neopaganism, a WikiProject dedicated to expanding, organizing, verifying, and NPOVing articles related to neopagan religions. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

	Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
Additional information: Related task forces (core areas): Ethics Related task forces (major fields): Philosophy of religion

Contents 1 Rule of four? 2 Fluctuations in the Law 3 Reliable sources for the term dharmic religions? 4 WikiProject class rating 5 Portishead "Third" 6 Conservation of energy?

[edit] Rule of four?

The rule of four link in the "See Also" section seems unrelated to me. If nobody disagrees with that, I'm going to remove the link from the See Also section soon. --dionyziz 00:54, 13 August 2005 (UTC).

Removed. --dionyziz 21:14, 16 August 2005 (UTC).

[edit] Fluctuations in the Law

Now, this is based off of information that I heard from a source I find to be personally reliable, but haven't read anywhere. 3 is the universal constant, however the Earth itself in recent years has upped the factor to 10 for beings on this planet as a defense mechanism. Is there any information on this out there, and if so can it be added in?

KV 06:51, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Let me speak as a witch briefly, rather than as a scholar. The three-fold law is very subjective, in a couple of different senses. First, it doesn't come from traditional Wicca, being Ray Buckland's subjective innovation. Second, the actual way this "pay-back" operates varies from person to person and situation to situation. The three-fold law is generally understood in a similar manner to the simplistic understanding of Karma, i.e. there's some cosmic bank-account or some force that reflects things back at the sender.

Now to understand this more realistically, lets forget for a minute any idea of a causal relationship between your actions and the things that happen to you. One does not cause the other. Yet there is a relationship between them. how so? It's simple: one's actions and one's experiences are both influenced by one's state of consciousness, level of understanding, self-delusions, etc. If you are self-deluded in a way that causes certain misbehaviour, this same self-delusion will attract various unpleasant occurrences to you. The forms that the bad behaviour and the unpleasant experiences take can often be ironically similar, since they stem from a single root cause. This means that if you sort things out at the root cause you won't necessarily have to "pay" for all your past infractions.

There are certain other factors in play here that can make the whole effect work a bit more like a straight "reflection": for instance, the psychological process of guilt can unconsciously help make the "payback" mirror the "action". Also when you're dealing with other people who might hold grudges, "payback" can become a much simpler concept.

The exact proportion of "payback" to "action" varies. For some people I would guess they get back less than they put out; however for witches and magicians the level of payback can be very large, well over 3 times, perhaps over 30 times in some situations. Just think: we devote our lives to developing power, and accumulating it around ourselves. This power needs to be volatile enough that we can cause dramatic changes to occur just by clicking our fingers. So if we have built up this volatile energy around ourselves and then misuse it, it can completely blow up in our faces.

Having said that, don't worry too much. If your intentions are good you should be fine. We all need to make a few mistakes :)

Anyway, this could have some bearing on the "3-fold" being upped to "10-fold". As we become more spiritually aware, and particularly as we become more technologically advanced, our ability to do ourselves major harm through misuse increases. (I hope this ramble of mine isn't a terrible abuse of the discussion page). Fuzzypeg 04:05, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

The three fold law violates the law of Thermodynamics. Its a crock. I'm still awaiting for my cup of coffee to be three times hotter than it was after I boiled it!!!!!!

Did anyone say we were talking about a closed thermodynamic system? Fuzzypeg☻ 04:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reliable sources for the term dharmic religions?

Where are the reliable sources that use the term dharmic religions in the context of this article? Dharmic religions is a now deleted obscure neologism and should not be used throughout Wikipedia. a good alternative is Indian religions. The number of google scholar results for "Indian religions"+"Indian religion" is (45.600 + 84.200) while it is only (492+475) for "dharmic religions" +"dharmic religion". See Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_September_8. Andries 19:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Portishead "Third"

The third LP by the English electronic band Portishead (titled "Third") contains an intro in Portuguese that paraphrases the Rule of Three. The english translation of the intro is as follows:

"Be aware of the rules of 3. What you give will come back at you. This lesson you must learn. You only get what you deserve." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asstro (talk • contribs) 02:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Conservation of energy?

Three times? Simple parsimony would support a 1:1 relationship, but that left aside, what about conservation of energy?

Can anyone supply some empirical evidence?

This is not a forum for original research or engaging editors in their own personal thoughts on such issues. There are chat groups for that. Here we're interested only in theories published by reputable authors. Our own opinions are of little consequence. Fuzzypeg★ 22:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)