Rule in Wild's Case
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Property law |
---|
Part of the common law series |
Acquisition of property |
Gift · Adverse possession · Deed |
Lost, mislaid, or abandoned |
Treasure trove |
Alienation · Bailment · License |
Estates in land |
Allodial title · Fee simple · Fee tail |
Life estate · Defeasible estate |
Future interest · Concurrent estate |
Leasehold estate · Condominiums |
Conveyancing of interests in land |
Bona fide purchaser |
Torrens title · Strata title |
Estoppel by deed · Quitclaim deed |
Mortgage · Equitable conversion |
Action to quiet title |
Limiting control over future use |
Restraint on alienation |
Rule against perpetuities |
Rule in Shelley's Case |
Doctrine of worthier title |
Nonpossessory interest in land |
Easement · Profit |
Covenant running with the land |
Equitable servitude |
Related topics |
Fixtures · Waste · Partition |
Riparian water rights |
Lateral and subjacent support |
Assignment · Nemo dat |
Other areas of the common law |
Contract law · Tort law |
Wills and trusts |
Criminal Law · Evidence |
The Rule in Wild's Case is a common law rule of construction dating back to 1599 concerning a particular type of ambiguity in devises (such as grants or bequests) of real property: If a grantor (O) grants, by deed or will, property to another person (A) with the language "To A and her children", who gets lawful possession of the property?
The rule resolves this ambiguity as follows:
- If A has living children at the time of the grant, A and her children take the property as joint tenants.
- If A does not have living children at the time of the grant, A takes the property in fee tail.
This rule has fallen into disuse in those jurisdictions which no longer recognize the fee tail as a legal estate. Some U.S. states ignore the rule altogether, and interpret such a grant as giving A a life estate and creating a remainder in her children. Section 14.2 of the Restatement (Third) of Property repudiates the Rule in Wild's Case, suggesting that many authorities consider it to be obsolete.
[edit] References
Dukeminier, Jesse, Johansen, Stanley M., Lindgren, James, and Sitkoff, Robert. Wills, Trusts, and Estates, 7th Edition, p. 664. Aspen Publishers, 2005. ISBN 0-7355-3695-3