Talk:Rufus King High School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Wisconsin. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. If you give this article a rating or change a previous rating, please leave a short summary in the comments to explain the rating and/or identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

	This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.	Schools Portal
Low	This article has been rated as low-Importance within Schools.

This article mentioned Rufus King was part of the WPA. This information was probably taken from here:

http://www2.milwaukee.k12.wi.us/king/local/school.html

I doubt the accuracy of this. Construction of the school began in 1932 and it opened for students in 1934. The WPA didn't start until FDR's executive order of May 6, 1935. If someone has more detailed information on why someone would think the WPA had anything to do with King's construction I'd be interested in seeing it. It's possible someone got confused and they actually meant the Public Works Administration which was started in 1933. It's possible that some funding for the construction was made available in this manner. I've left the article a bit vague since I don't have any conclusive sources that attribute construction to the PWA.

sam 08:22, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] response to DBP

I will think about changing somethings, like the name, and I do understand your concerns about info overlapping but was not completely finished with my editing of the page. King's Realm began reproduction at the beginning of this semester, under the direction of Mr. Docktor. I will add to the forensics and athletic pages, because we do have more than just a basketball team, (King's about getting rid of urban stereotypes, not glorifying them). I will also get to the bottom of the General King bio, so people can chill out, and finally add info about fine arts and King's political and social active history in the last couple of years.

[edit] soccer team

I removed the reference at the top of the article to King's "globally ranked" soccer team. No disrespect to Jim McClure (he's an old friend of mine), but I'd like to see something to back that up. I found no references in a Google search. Also, it shouldn't be at the top, it should be in the athletics section if it's accurate.

[edit] Major edits of 29 December 2005

Hello all,

Great work on this entry! I hadn't even realized there was so much "forensics love" out there. When I think back to the "nothing" team we had when I was a student, all of this still feels surreal.

Much of what I updated is to ensure concise wording (i.e., "for the college bound" was dropped from our "offcial" name, and everyone knows a school name is going to be shortened -- this is an encyclopedia; not a slangtionary. Also, when you refer to a nickname for a school, it's usually in relation to the mascot. For example, I went to Carroll College. Our mascot was the Pioneer (Carroll is Wisconsin's first, or pioneer college). Our nickname was the "Pios." Nicknames like "K-House" and "Dynasty" are temporary and are more of a reflection of a current generation of students and school climate than the true fabric of a school that's been around for close to two-thirds of a century). Additionally, there were some grammatical and syntax errors that I just couldn't sit by as a teacher and abide. ;-)

On a related note, we have a new Web site that will be rolling out this next month -- www.rkhs.org. I don't know if the current webmaster has been notified yet, but it should be happening *officially* in the next week or so. I decided with all of the Web site updates, now would be a good time to edit this entry.

Finally, a special shout-out to my classmate, Sam Etler... c/o '95 represent!

Regards, Adam (That's Mr. Jacobi to you, Michael... or at least for the next five months).

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Nflchamp.jpg

Image:Nflchamp.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:RKHS shield.png

Image:RKHS shield.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Advertising?

This article sounds A LOT like an advertisment, such as...

The school promotes positive values in a culturally-diverse setting. Rufus King students are of many and varied interests, the heart of which is motivation to compete, achieve, and excel academically.

I find nothing wrong with trying to advertise a school, but Wikipedia is for information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigbobon1 (talk • contribs) 14:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)