Talk:RTMark

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Internal inconsistency

The title of this article is "®TM", but both the first and second lines of the article refer to "®TMark". Which is correct? Note that I understand the superscript limitation; I'm referring to the presence/absence of the "ark" bit. -- DH85868993 05:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

(Note: there is no such limitation for this case, since there is a ™ symbol) +mt 23:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Move back to RTMark

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 07:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

The present name of "®TM" is not a really good choice, and is only rendered for logos on the website (all other references use upper case "RTMARK"). Move this back to RTMark? +mt 23:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Concur with this rational logic, and per naming convention and WP:MOSTM. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 23:27, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

[edit] What SimCopter hack?

This is not explained in the article, and the external link is dead. Could someone please fix this? Loganberry (Talk) 19:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)