User talk:Rtkat3/Archive 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Digimon merge tags
Please don't remove the merge tags from the Digimon articles. It's been pretty clear for a while now that we shouldn't have individual articles for each Digimon. This has been supported in many AfDs, similar discussions, at WP:DIGI, and our notablility guidelines at WP:FICT. A discussion notice regarding the merges has been present on every Digimon's talk page for a few months now, so maybe you should bring any concerns you have to the discussion first? -- Ned Scott 02:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edit Summaries (revisited)
When editing an article, there is a small field labeled "Summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
It is highly recommended that one fill in the edit summary field, as it makes it easier for you and your fellow contributors to understand what has changed, and is helpful when going through the history of the page. Also, multiple edits to the same page in quick succession without edit summaries may be interpretted as vandalism. Use the Show Preview button before saving a page. Numerous editors have repeatedly recommended this policy to you, and you continue to be negligent. JPG-GR 21:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Baku (Tokyo Black Cat Girl)
I left a message on the Talk page for this article, but I don't think you saw it.... Could you read it now if you haven't aleady? A reply would be appreciated, too. Thanks. --MessengerCrow13 ~Listen*To*Your*Heart*Beat~ *talk*contributions* 18:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
(Replied on my talk page and forgot to reply here e.e)
I've looked at the Tokyo Black Cat Girl manga, and there doesn't seem to be very many different types of Bakus, not enough to make an article.
And the manga Chimera Animas.... Yea, I'm working on on that, just very, very slowly. --MessengerCrow13 ~Listen*To*Your*Heart*Beat~ *talk*contributions* 16:06, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] "Acts of Vengeance" reverts
This is a heads up as to why some of your edits the the "Acts of Vengeance" article have been reverted.
The nutshell reason is that the Comics Project has a guideline to not use Roman numerals with succession characters. The full guideline can be found here.
Thanks for listening... — J Greb 23:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Night at the Museum
Thank you for your edit to NATM. However, your edit added almost 1,200 words to the plot. It is now almost 2,000 words long and contradicts the Wikipedia:WikiProject Films/Style guidelines and WP:Films, which state that a plot summary should be no longer than 400-700 words. Please do not add so much detail since the article is not a summary for seeing the movie. Keep editing!!! ~Gatorgirl623~ 23:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] chimera anima
Why the hell do you keep on moving the "confusion of correct translation"?? What annoys me more, is that you DO NOT even bother to write up a summary to why you always move it. I've aleady told you to tell me why you keep on moving it, and you still ignore me, so if my tone is rather negitive, it most definitaly is.
I have already told you why I say it should be at the beginning of the article, and you have not said 1 word why it should be moved down. Let me refresh you memory, since I highly doubt you remember.
Many fans dont know the correct translation. They keep saying it is "animal" when it is not. This maybe cause Tokyopop translated 2 ways. That would confuse anyone. Fans keep on debating what is the correct trnaslation, so it is not really clear to many fans who is right and who is wrong.
I expect you will actually respond. "THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED!" 22:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Well why didnt you say anything? I felt like I was just typing for no reason. "THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED!" 02:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
"I will try to start a page called "List of minor characters in Tokyo Mew Mew" soon. I've seen the Japanese episodes (with subtitles) on YouTube once. Rtkat3 (User talk:Rtkat3) 8:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)" (Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Angelofdeath275")
- I've already made a list on my user sub-page (there is a link to it from my main user page). I can add info from the original anime, too, you can help me, then this stuff can be moved to the articles. Yume no Kishi
Now I have no clue how to merge your minor characters list with mine... I mean, I was trying to add their names in kanji and such, but because of the font of the headers it looks awful... Yume no Kishi
I said - I don't know where to place the kanji, since you made characters' names into headers. If you have any ideas, you can take the kanji from my page and place them wherever you like. This stuff should be on the page, too, I think. Yume no Kishi
I was thinking about adding more stuff to the Minor Characters List... Since I'm going to add kanji for the names and the names' translations as I watch random episodes and write out the names from the ending credits, maybe add the "Name Pronunciation" thing, too, like in the main characters' articles? Or it'll be too much info for such a long page? Yume no Kishi
[edit] AfD nomination of Rabbitmon
I've nominated Rabbitmon, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Rabbitmon satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabbitmon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Rabbitmon during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Inkpaduta 15:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikiproject Narnia Newsletter March 2007
 Issue 1 - 2nd March 2007 . Written by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Also, may I advise you to archive your talk page? ;) --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 10:19, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Its and it's
Hi Rtkat3,
Thank you for your many contributions to Wikipedia. However, some of your recent contributions indicate you may not understand the difference between it's and its. "It's" means "it is" or "it has". "It's" never means "belonging to it". "Its" means "belonging to it". On February 16th, I cleaned up the article Gorgom, removing incorrect instances of "it's" where "its" is correct. Today I went back in and fixed it again. I noticed you were the one adding all those "it's"; I've just fixed 16 incorrect instances of "it's" on that page.
Your contributions to Wikipedia are deeply appreciated, and you shouldn't at all feel embarrassed about the mistake, because many people make the same error. However, we want Wikipedia to look as professional as possible, and that includes trying to correct any spelling errors or typos which have found their way into the text. Best wishes and happy editing, Firsfron of Ronchester 18:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Pop Star
Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Doesn't it make it uncomfortable if all the pictures are all stacked on the right hand side and crunched off the section each are intended to be in?
Well? --Addict 2006 00:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Villain categories
Maybe you don't realize it, but all those villain categories had already been deleted through consensus via CfD. You might not want to waste your time recreating and populating categories that now qualify for speedy deletion as recreations. Doczilla 05:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of List of Virtual Dungeon monsters
An editor has nominated List of Virtual Dungeon monsters, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Virtual Dungeon monsters and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. --Ng.j 18:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] MAR article's images
Well, the problem is not whether the images are suitable, I think it's more like whether it's neccessary to image even the insignificant Rooks and Bishops ? Very few of them actually make it to the end, and even fewer play a remotely major role. Just personal opinion, I'd still like to have yours though.
As for the masked Kouga(/masked minor Knight} images, it's again the neccessity in question here. They play a more active role, all right, but you see the current length of their sections just doesn't capaciate us. How do you think the article would look like, if juxtaposing next to a succinct biography is two 200-pixeled images ? Out of the place, and an eyesore too, personally speaking.
And the masked Phantom(/masked major Knights) images, I understand the need for them, as I myself when first uploading the picture did ponder it for some while. But it just can't helped at the moment. You see, again, we can't have more than one image, it'll botch the article rather than beautify. (They would look fantastic for seperate articles, but I've discovered that I can find none among us watchers to actually conceive the accurate contents of the episodes. We do have the summaries, but they're not of perfect accuracy either, and I don't want to add any false presumptions there). As for the "Tom" image, is it really that important ? That "Tom" part took up a very small part of the story, unimportant and little to none.
P/S: Heartfelt gratitude if you could see to it that this taking-without-asking incident will not happen again. Should that ever to unfortunately re-occur (and I sincerely wish it will not), I'm afraid I will have to take extreme measure; I will delete EVERY picture in the MAR article.
Profet 666 15:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Well, now I think about it, there's still a way around it if you're that desperate for images. I can leave the link for the image in each character's section, does that sound okay enough to you ? Since after all, I don't very much enjoy the idea of putting all of them there. Profet 666 08:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Request for ÄRM images
I'm afraid I might have to disagree with your request. Unless I'm very much mistaken, there are nearly 100 ÄRMs listed in the article. I've never known of an article with such image amount, and I doubt it will benifit if we're too fussy about the subject illustration and blow it. Don't mean to damp your ardour, this and the time before your considerateness is something to be valued and treated with all due respect, but zeal needs brain. 222.252.119.239 03:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Bishop's and Rook's ÄRMs
Okay, looks like we need to agree on one option instead of just spoiling the other's contributions. Do you prefer we put all the lacking ÄRMs of Bishop rank downward in the Chess Pieces article, or we just leave an external link to the ÄRM article so everyone can check should they care ? Personally I've been favoring the 2nd (since it was suggested long ago that there's little need to add the ÄRMs of those most trivial characters), and if we have all the ÄRMs in the character articles, the ÄRM page should be of little use. Profet 666 04:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image requests
The image requests on Pozun's and Edward's picture in the List of minor character in Mär have been cleared. I've also added one for Gaira. Profet 666 02:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] re: Image request response & more
I've received the message. And that method you recommended is.. ? (and in case you didn't know, Garon & Leno are still pretty much in the trivia rank.. Girome maybe, but not these two) Profet 666 05:38, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Avengers: The Initiative
Heya! I noticed you added links to all the characters on the Initiative cover to the main Initiative page. Just to let you know, there was already such a list on the page for the image of the cover (just click the image in the infobox to see it). You might want to compare the two if you get a chance, to make sure the links match up. 24.136.11.242 03:42, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Re: "Potential Recruits" I added links to the Avengers: The Initiative page for all the potential recruits listed in the back of CW:BDR which actually had wikipedia pages. There are a whole LOT who are not on wikipedia yet - dozens, in fact. Perhaps if I get a chance, I'll add some dummy links to them. 204.153.84.10 14:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
-
- I see you found a home for these guys on the Camp Hammond page. I added links for all of the other "Potential Recruits" - most of whom don't have a page yet. Do with that what you will! 24.136.11.242 00:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] split tag
Stop adding the split tag to Digimon article lists. We've talked about this before, and the consensus there as well as with Wikipedia-wide guidelines was to merge. -- Ned Scott 00:32, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Uchuu Keiji Shaider
You will be reported to Wikipidea Administrators if you continue vandalizing Uchuu Keiji Shaider article without providing any legitimate reason for doing so. You are warned!!!!! Mathg333k (talk) 17:28, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reply
Overall (from what I've seen at least, as I'm a regular video game article editor), not many game articles have massive voice lists. Marvel Ultimate Alliance shouldn't be an exception, just because it has 100's of characters that are voiced. As a compromise: I can understand the main character voices being listed, but not everyone. RobJ1981 18:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Merge tags
Please don't remove merge tags until the discussion is over. TTN 17:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- They will be sorted after they are merged. The villains are going to be split off to a general character list anyways. TTN 17:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reply: Chess Pieces-related info
As far as I can tell, the Ghost Chess is an anime-only Chess sub group featured in the filler eps 86-93. It consisted of Chess members who were infatuated with Ghost ARMs, direct subordinates of Phantom/the Queen (I'm not sure who). More details on them would put a (long) summary of this filler part into consideration, you can know more about them in the fansite MAR Heaven Journey (all of which was in Spanish though, try using a translation tool). Though I can confidently boast of having watched the whole series (including the yet-to-be-translated eps), about this particular group I only have a very vague concept of, so I can't yet write anything about them.
About the image caps, my opinion remains one and the same: Chaton, Pano and Loco, the three unknighted members of the Chess, are the only three whose sections I think in dire need of illustration - aside from them, almost all the others are, beg pardon, insignificant junks. I don't know what Kaldea-invading Chess guy you were talking about (about 30 of them there), but sure you agree just two hopelessly minor appearances are not worth the troubles of getting an image cap for anyone ? Profet 666 02:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reply: Chess Pieces response
Rondo or whatever, he's still Rook-ranked and not worth us shooting an image for him. About the Reginrave princess thing you proposed, I have no objection (and the one she was marrying was Carl, a soldier of Reginrave who was featured in the two filler episodes 66-67). A Ghost Chess page is obviously necessary, but I don't see how I can get some information about them in good details - as it concerned quite a part of this series' fillers which unfortunately happens to be the part I had little to no idea what it was about. Worse still, these Ghost Chess guys were somehow connected to -what was it- Klavier (a MAR Heaven's lost civilization ? dunno..), Kaldea, Phantom, Diana, and its leader as rumours had it once had a love interest in Phantom's dead ex-girlfriend. And the reason he and his lackeys aided Phantom also had something fishy to it. I'm at the end of my rope; I can't find anything that can tell me the details. MAR Heaven Journey has on display the covers of 13 MAR DVDs, which must mean that part is on sale somewhere, but I don't know where. We must know all these first before we write anything.
About the Chess Pieces article nomination for deletion, I'm currently trying to seek more credible sources (one of which is the Japanese MAR article). Which doesn't seem to be an easy task.
While we're at it, was the MAR manga article deleted ? Shouldn't we make another one ? Profet 666 02:38, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ghost Chess
Wait, are you sure about what you submitted ? About the Ghost Chess being Diana's direct subordinates ? If you just wrote it off my words, I pray you don't. As I said I don't have exact information. Or did you ask MAR Heaven Journey's webmistresses themselves ? Then I pray you take caution, as they didn't understand all being (detailedly) said in the raw episodes. And you should know better than me what would result from it. Profet 666 09:22, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Initiative Potential Recruits
This section got removed; feel free to make use of it as you please.
[edit] 2 things
First off: please don't re-add the future section to Marvel: Ultimate Alliance again. It's game guide content not suitable for Wikipedia. It's telling people what to do, to get a certain ending. Even if the endings were listed without the guide information, it would still be a bit trivial and not very notable for Wikipedia. Secondly: I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! RobJ1981 04:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Is there a certain reason why you choose not to use an edit summary and clearly ignore what I posted? Frankly, just ignoring notes could lead to future problems with other editors, as they will say the same thing I bet. It only takes a little bit to add a summary, I don't see what the big deal is. RobJ1981 21:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chimera Anima pics attempted to be remmoved again
I reverted what the User did because I feel the pictures are rather impotant to the article. But I know the person will revert what I did. THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED! 03:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] VAs on older Power Rangers monsters articles being removed
I started re-adding them to their pages, but do you think they were right to remove them in the first place? I figured I'd ask you because you're usually providing us with the needed information on articles like those - information that keeps getting deleted. 71.167.117.241 (talk) 22:31, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Phantom's images
With the absurd requisition of his masked & unmasked image in the two article Phantom and Chess Pieces (putting them both in each), it appeared you have yet to see through my purpose. I mean no more arrogance than this simple mere word - as I've had a good grasp of the whole series, it looks to me like sooner or later, we will need a seperate article for almost every Knight - yes, Phantom, Peta, Rolan, Candice, Chimera, Halloween, Ian or Magical Lou, Kouga, Pinocchio even; though don't start acting upon my words again, earlier it partly resulted in the submission of the Ghost Chess article and I've seen less eyesores - (and team MAR). So I intend to submit the masked images of the Knights in the main Chess Pieces article whenever one of them gets his/her own article, and the unmasked image will be redirected to the personal article. Well, people see the masked face in the main Chess Pieces article, and if they want to know more they read the seperate article with the unmasked face in it - good save of space, don't you think ? So please cease putting both images in each article after you read this - I will be very sorry indeed to remove the masked Phantom image, but I will do it nevertheless if it threatens to mar the face of both articles.
By the way, you've read the manga have you not ? Was Magical Lou really Magical Lou or Magical Roe ? Profet 666 01:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Phantom response
Oh, Ash too. My bad.
And can you submit another article for the MAR manga page ? I don't purchase the manga so I have neither the akt titles nor the cover pics, but if you can take care of the title part I think I can risk my neck sneaking some pics out of Viz's site. Hope you are not against it; all's for the greater good. Profet 666 03:29, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: MAR-related
Well, do as you see fit about the Ghost Chess. I myself will try watching the raw episodes again, now that my Japanese has improved a good deal. Never mind their ARMs, I will see if I can translate their names, but then the abilities will be up to you and our webmistresses.
And as for that Bishop matter... honestly, less-featured characters are nominal. I don't think there's any need to pictorially demonstrate them - cases like this are here and there. And since in vol.2, Alviss stated that from Rook rank up, each member will wear a personal mask - or robe, or whatever to cover their face - I don't see any need in stating "A few of the Bishops wears masks, while the strongest wears robe" as you previously did in the Chess Pieces article. Sigh. They are of the higher rank, they can wear masks or robes or nothing at all to shroud their appearances, okay ? Alviss didn't mention anything about they might not be wearing masks doesn't mean we have to cite each and every exceptions.
About the ARM images, well if you so insist, it's okay to get some pics of ARMs in action. But just one for each type, okay ? There are about 100 ARMs listed there and I doubt very much the administrators will overlook such blatant flooding. I'm not sure what I want to give a pic of, so you choose one from each type yourself. (What about Holy ARMs and Unique ARMs, then ? We only know 4 Holy-typed so far, and each of it so differs in appearance I don't know which will be best to give readers a general concept of them. Same goes with Unique-typed. And what do we do about Ian's unknown weapons ? Ignore them, yes ?) Profet 666 01:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your edits to the talk page of Marvel: Ultimate Alliance
I noticed that you edited someone else's comment for clarity, spelling or grammar. As a rule, please refrain from editing others' comments without their permission. Though it may appear helpful to correct typing errors, grammar, etc., please do not go out of your way to bring talk pages to publishing standards, since it is not terribly productive and will tend to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thanks! RobJ1981 17:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Underdog
Please, no profanity. Pahrak bionicle lover 02:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Shinma
Hi! I don't have much time. I travel a lot, but as much as I can I'll try to get some nice snapshots of the shinmas to enrich the page. Cheers!Vae victis 03:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Toy Meets Girl
An article that you have been involved in editing, Toy Meets Girl, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toy Meets Girl. Thank you. -- Jreferee (Talk) 17:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Heres to you
 |
The Original Barnstar | |
| After going through the page histories of the Tokyo Mew Mew related articles, I see you have created many of them, but no one has the courtesy to thank you for doing so. So, I'm thanking you, because many of the articles would not be around if I wasn't for you. THROUGH FIRE JUSTICE IS SERVED! 18:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC) |
There is one, but I mentioned it on the Saint Rose Crusaders article. I'll go add to the Chimera aritcle. THROUGH FIRE JUSTICE IS SERVED! 19:22, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] MAR manga
Do you happen to own the manga ? If you do, could you please check volume 2 & 3 and get me the name of the town Jack does his tradings (vol.2) and the castle Vidar's trees populated (vol.3) ? Please reply ASAP. Profet 666 11:53, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chisato as a Shinma
Hi, why did you take Chisato from the Shinma list? To avoid spoilers? Or do you disagree that she is a Shinma? I guess the series explains it very clearly. I strongly disagree with this! Cheers. Vae victis 14:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of Frank Catalano
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Frank Catalano, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Frank Catalano seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Frank Catalano, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 10:03, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Avengers/Initiative edit
I reverted your edit, because, to date - there is no prrof that any of these folk are actually in the series. You me or another editor looking at the cover and saying, 'hey, that looks like Batroc or Sgy Rock, or Fraggle Rock,' is not enough, as it constitutes OR by synthesis. We as editors cannot make that determination - the character has to be identified by name within the comic book. I would be willing to allow a list of these heroes (cited by issue where they are named). Without such precautions, we are opening the door to a LOT of OR speculation. if you need help, let me know, but understand that I would oppose a wholsesale inclusion again without the aforementioned protections in place. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 03:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use image over use and Chess Pieces (MÄR)
The images on this article were removed for a reason. The images simply are not necessary to the article. Per WP:NFCC item #3(a), "Multiple items are not used if one will suffice; one is used only if necessary." These images perhaps appropriate for subpages on each of these characters, but not on a "List of..." type page. Such uses are being deprecated all over the project. See User:Durin/Fair_Use_Overuse#Complete for plenty of examples. Also, please note that all of these images lack a sufficient fair use rationale. The rationale give is generic, not specific to the articles intended in their use. Regardless, the images are not acceptable on this article as you intend them. Please do not re-add these images as this constitutes a violation of our fair use policy. Please stop revert warring over this. If you have questions about this, I'd be happy to answer. Thanks, --Durin 19:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chaotic WikiProject Proposal
Chaotic articles on Wikipedia. Some of us have decided to start a WikiProject for it, if you're intrested please add your name to the proposal on this page.
[edit] Re: Chess Pieces images problem
No sweat. Artist_Formerly_Known_As_Whocares has already proposed to take care of making individual articles, and after they're done I will help with editing them. You can find more information regarding this here. Profet 666 06:12, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use???
Hi, I keep receiving msgs stating that my snapshot uploads do not qualify as "fair use". Do you happen to have any experience with this? I have seen hundreds of snapshots of TV, etc around Wikipedia. I don't think they are harmful in any way... Vae victis 16:42, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] May I ?
(well I know who is who in the hooded, cloaked Zodiac Knights already, you don't have to give identifying instructions) While you're at it, could you ask the webmistresses of MÄR-Heaven Journey what firm releases the DVDs of which covers are put on display on their site ? Was it a Japanese firm or a Chinese firm ? I highly doubt it's a Western firm, since the only one I know to be releasing MÄR DVDs is VIZ Media. Profet 666 01:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Omnitrix
Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Omnitrix. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Groupthink 14:34, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please
(Show what with the what ?) Anyway the network over here seems to be undergoing technical problems, access is scarce so if you have time please ask them about the DVDs. Meanwhile I will try to recover the manga page; a friend of mine purchased the manga so perhaps I can request from her the akt titles Profet 666 (talk) 15:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Chaotic WikiProject
It's now been started, the page is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:CHAOTIC Please add your name to the participants. khlieeq t • e • c 01:00, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Video Games
I was under the impression that character's appereances in video games are supposed to be the most basic of basic information. I didn't revert anything, I just felt you should be aware. Someone else will most likely end up reverting it. Lots42 21:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Please Use Edit Summaries
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Your edits seem to lack edit summarys way to often, and sometimes appear to be vandalism. PLEASE use the edit summary! Thank you. Tiptoety 00:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Seperate pages
Oh thank God you do. Please aid Artist in making the articles; I'll be more than glad to help you edit them. I'm currently busy with the Chess' bio, which should be uploaded by tomorrow.
And is it really okay, returning the Zonnen article's images back to their places ? Profet 666 09:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] What madness is this ?
I object to the submission of any Chess seperate articles beside the 5 elites Knight (Phantom, Peta, Chimera, Halloween, Rolan), Candice, Ash, Ian and Chaton. You're misintepreting your own purpose - you're not submitting articles that will narrate detailed information about the characters, what you're doing is more like an attempt to keep the pictures on Wiki - which, I have no doubt, will soon be vain due to the articles' inevitable deletions. Since:
- I'd rather take care of the more significant articles first, and I don't think I can make it to those small fries you just scrounged an article for before they're deleted with the way they're written
- And excuse my rudness, but are your wits about you, thinking one-time characters like Garon, Gido, etc... have enough about them for me to write (I, who dig into the smallest details, the most vague mentions to get enough for writing) ? Like, Rapunzel, what did she do beside showing up in one battle only to be un-Knighted several episodes later ? Or Galian, who last time I counted was only screened big TWO time ? And Kouga and Pinoccio and Magical Roe ? (And Vizel !?)
P/S: And can you do something about the navigation template ? Make it.. ugh... look less crammed ? Profet 666 10:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Madness response
Pardon me about Pano and Gido then, I will have a word with Artist about this, but still you're the culprit responsible for that remaining mass of redundant articles, are you not ? And am I bearing witness to further madness here, you saying the raison d'être of those articles is to get a way around it and keep those images on Wiki ? What lame rationale is that ? Was it my delusion, thinking pictures are uploaded for the sake of the articles and not the other way around ? If it wasn't, since when has it come to pass ?
I admit, the dismission of the Knight images is unfortunate indeed and I also second their keeping - but it's not the case with the minor character pictures. Nay, nil, negative. How about you try broadening your line of vision first and see that the Chess Pieces article wil stay alive and healthy even without those small-time faces ? Profet 666 15:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: re: Madness response
I'd have loved it (having the minor character images restored, that is), but upon reflecting on the discussion regarding the use of non-free images earlier in Durin's talk I think there's little to no chance for it.
About the Luberian section you recommended, personally I think it's a good idea, but then we won't be able to help ourselves not dumping other characters (those outside of Cross Guard or Luberia) into a seperate section, and it's already sounded messy in my head. Profet 666 06:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: MAR wiki
What do you mean, a MAR Wiki like Yu-Gi-Oh, Digimon and the others ? Whatever you mean, I doubt its chance. The type like Yu-Gi-Oh is much more abundant in Wikifiable materials; MAR is hardly.
And I will upload the masked images when the damn articles look better - like, one good section for personality, one for background, and one for role. Have a look at them and ask your heart whether those crappy articles would look like a pool to pour non-free images into to us insane Wikipedians' hearts' content if I upload another bunch of images there or not. We're both exponentially evolved humans; we might be civilized in different cultures but even those varying cultures share some common standards - like it's very unsightly to pee on the street. Therefore however our sense of beauty might conflict, there ought to be a point where these two parallel lines would join - and I believe they meet when it comes to whether or not those two-imaged craps of article is of Wiki standard. Profet 666 01:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fire-crabs
A tag has been placed on Fire-crabs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SQL(Query Me!) 05:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: MAR Wiki
(how did that come to be !?) Ugh.. then how do I develop it ? Do the articles on Wiki first then link them all to the MAR Wiki or (I suppose this question is silly) drop everything I'm gonna do on Wiki and go over to the MAR Wiki ? Really, I could have just made it detailed in one as well as the other, the MAR Wiki isn't all that needed - isn't the only good it will do us is that we can upload pictures there ? And talking about pictures there are no copyright-upholding zealots of administrator over MAR Wiki, are there ? Profet 666 12:33, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use
Help me. The bots are insistently marking the Shinma images for deletion even though they have solid rationales. I read the instructions and concluded that we need to create a separate article for each Shinma. This is a little too much... Can you give an idea of how we solve this question? Vae victis 22:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Trivia
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content of marginal relevance (unnecessary trivia) to articles is not considered productive. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Doceirias 23:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikiproject Digimon
At Wikiproject Digimon, we are about to undergo a large project and we wish to see how many people wish to help and contribute. If you wish to help please sign here. Trainra 06:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] MARpedia
I have already decided to contibute to MARpedia, and have even made a few articles (Girom, Garon, Aqua. and Kannochi. The unregistered user was me). Just wanted to verify this. Artist Formerly Known As Whocares 21:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Video Games
These need a mention only - there is no need to relay the story. Remember, it is not a fan site.
Asgardian 00:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Red Hulk
As User:ThuranX has noted also in response to your edit at Hulk (comics), please note that WikiProject Comics guidelines disallow the use of solicitations as reference sources. This being an encyclopedia and not a news site or a magazine, the larger Wikipedia policy of WP:CRYSTAL strictly regulates claims of future events.
Also please note that WPC guidelines specifically disallow highly detailed synopses. We're only to use the minimal, streamlined amount to make major events understandable to general-audience readers. Thanks. --Tenebrae 21:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Spider-Man: Friend or Foe
Concerning the voice actors you recently added to the page, is there a source(s) on one of the video game sites that confirms all of them? I'm sure I've seen one before? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- Just one last question: who's computer (voiced by Kathryn Cressida)? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:18, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] X2
Please read Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles. Trivia lists are a very lazy way of writing. Alientraveller 18:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- No trivia. Right appropriate information instead in a proper, strucured, well-written manner, not an endlessly random list. Alientraveller 18:59, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unilateral splits and merges
Hi. Just a friendly reminder that we're all a team here, cooperating with each other and soliciting input on major article changes. If we think that splitting off a section, for example, is a good idea that will stand up to scrutiny, we do a posting at Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Notice Board#Requested moves, merges, and splits. If there's no objection after a week or so, then go for it. There's no merger or split here so time-sensitive it can't wait a week for consensus. Thanks. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Merge tags
Do not randomly remove merge tags that you do not agree with. Voice your opinion on the merge target's talk page. TTN 22:14, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Merge Tags
Please do not remove merge tags taht you do not agree with, this could be consider vandalism. Please allow discussion first to conclude. -66.109.248.114 21:47, 1 December 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Dude
The Tunnelers was a perfect page for all Cybelle, Blowhard and the other loveable, now-dead goofballs. Having seperate pages for all of them just needlessly repeats info. Lots42 (talk) 00:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] December 2007
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. jonny-mt 16:58, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your edits to Imaginationland
Stop re-adding the character lists: they aren't notable, and it's trivial listcruft/clutter. Stop ignoring edit summaries of the people that revert you. RobJ1981 (talk) 21:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- [1]: South Park wiki. One google search and I found it easily. Instead of edit warring: you should've looked for the actual Wiki. RobJ1981 (talk) 21:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Marvel: Ultimate Alliance Revisited
OK. Here it is. You've been advised that the information you keep adding in character profiles on this game is inappropriate and superfluous. If you persist, I have to call for formal comment and that can end with you being banned (albeit temporarily) if you continue. Once again, a mention that a character appears in the game is enough - a blow-by-blow account of the plot is unnecessary. Passion is a fine thing, but here things have to be done the "Wiki" way - otherwise the entries are no better than fan sites.
Asgardian (talk) 07:33, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Hollow-related
I didn't remove them. In any event, the reasons behind their removal can be attributed to this discussion. ~SnapperTo 18:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Shadow Moon
An article that you have been involved in editing, Shadow Moon, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadow Moon. Thank you.
This is a trial of the AfD notification bot. If you found this message helpful, annoying or have anything else to say about it please leave a message at User_talk:BJBot, thanks! --BJBot (talk) 16:05, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Enough
Note that the entries you have made on Abomination; Acts of Vengeance and Mephisto amount to vandalism. Seriously, you have been using Wikipedia long enough to know that this level of editing is sub-standard and not in accordance with Wiki-policy. Any more repeat instances - or unnecessary additions to Video Game references and it will be brought to the attention of a moderator.
