User talk:Rptng03509345

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "see above"

Decline reason: "obvious trolling"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] helpme request

The help me tag is not for unblock requests or merely to seek attention. --pgk(talk) 16:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

"(STOP VANDALIZING MY TALK PAGE YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE)" continue like this and I'll protect this page from further editing. wikipedia is not a soapbox and no personal attacks --pgk(talk) 17:11, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
People will stop reverting your talk page when you stop using it as a soapbox. Hipocrite - «Talk» 17:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
As promised --pgk(talk) 17:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spam

I have never taken any action on your account (or any socks of it, to my knowledge) and am uninvolved in the Encyclopedia Dramatica dispute. Do not spam random administrators about your problems. If you have a legitimate issue (and are not blocked), you can bring it up on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Better yet, take it to a forum designed to resolve disputes, such as Wikipedia:Requests for Comment. However, do not email (or even post to the talk of) of uninvolved admins. I will not discuss this with you again. Superm401 - Talk 02:21, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Ditto. Tyrenius 18:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Same. Postdlf 03:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Indeed. Spamming people who don't know you implies that you've already made enemies of all the people who do. Not a good introduction. Isomorphic 05:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)


Rptng03509345 / barbecue43564,
Your e-mail, loaded with so-called "vital information on admin abuse", looks like a smear campaign. You didn't tell me who you are and what you need help with in your e-mail. You didn't even sign your e-mail. Sigh. Instead of bothering total strangers, please make use of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct. The "evidence" you've collected may be useful there. Good luck. --PFHLai 12:34, 21 July 2006 (UTC)