Talk:RPL (programming language)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] RPL acronym
Is Reverse Polish LISP truly a synonym for Reverse Polish Language, or is RP LISP a separate thing that uses the concept of RP Language within the context of the LISP language? If the latter, Reverse Polish LISP should have its own page and not be a redirect, or should have a separate paragraph within this article. -- Jeff Q 02:20, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comment; the article is now updated to reflect this. In fact the term Reverse Polish language is unheard-of, since it might just as well mean FORTH... --Wernher 03:18, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
-
- Thank you for clearing that up. I made a few minor changes to conform to standard English punctuation practices. Please revert if I have inadvertently changed the meaning of your excellent description. And thanks for providing this interesting article! -- Jeff Q 06:43, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Postfix conditional structures
There is a simple postfix-based way to implement if/then/else structures, which RPN purists would prefer.
The following example uses the IFT ("if-then") function to pop an object from the bottom of the stack, and if it is equal to 1, replace it with "One":
« 1 == "One" IFT »
The following example uses the IFTE ("if-then-else") function to pop an object from the bottom of the stack, and if it is equal to 1, replace it with "One", otherwise replace it with "Not one":
« 1 == "One" "Not" IFTE »
These structures can of course be nested. Both of the following examples pop an object from the bottom of the stack, and replace it with "One", "Less", or "More", depending on whether it is equal to, less than, or greater than 1.
« DUP 1 == « DROP "One" » « 1 < "Less" "More" IFTE » IFTE » « -> x « x 1 == "One" « x 1 < "Less" "More" IFTE » IFTE » »
Tony.
- I added a section for IFT/IFTE, using some of the content you've placed here. --MatthewMastracci 19:27, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
[edit] REALITY
The recently-added content about the REALITY Programming Language is a different subject altogether. It should be moved to a new article, and a disambiguation page created. Rwxrwxrwx 11:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)