Talk:Royal Rumble (1992)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Royal Rumble (1992) article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Professional wrestling Portal Royal Rumble (1992) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Bret Hart's "fever"

To clear something up...Bret Hart's fever was a kayfabed condition thought up by Hart himself as he didn't want to seem weak by losing cleanly to The Mountie. The resultant "fever" meant The Mountie pinned a not-100% champion. - Draven Cage 18/01/07 @ 20:56

Do you have proof one way or the other? Also, remember to sign your posts by typing ~~~~. TJ Spyke 21:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah I have proof. I read it on the Wikipedia entry for Bret Hart. - Draven Cage 27/02/07 @ 19:40. Ps, what do you mean by "sign my post with ~~~~?

You can't use Wikipedia as a source for something else on Wikipedia. Do you see a paper encyclopedia citing itself? As for signing, you are supposed to sign your posts. Typing in ~~~~ produces you username, date and time (although the date and time is UTC rather than your local time). TJ Spyke 21:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough, but is the entry on the Bret Hart page verified? If so, then that should count as a reliable source. Unless you're saying Wikipedia itself cannot be counted as a reliable source. HDC7777 17:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC) (Well, whaddayaknow, it works)

You have to use the original source. I think Bret Hart confirmed it on his DVD (I will check later to make sure). TJ Spyke 23:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Edit: I guess not. TJ Spyke 01:46, 10 March 2007 (UTC)