Talk:Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Norway Portal This article is part of WikiProject Norway, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Norway. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale.

Portal	Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy falls within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a project to create and improve Denmark-related Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, all interested editors are welcome!
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (FAQ). (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: Associated task forces (general topics): Maritime warfare task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): Nordic military history task force Associated task forces (periods and conflicts): Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792–1815)

[edit] Move?

I propose renaming this article Royal Dano-Norwegian Navy to better reflect the conventional English rendition of dansk-norsk. //Big Adamsky 14:30, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree. But for some reason I do want it to be Danish-Norwegian. I'll move it anyway.Inge 15:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

The move is done. But if someone disagrees just say so.Inge 18:25, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Excellent! I didn't quite understand whether you agreed or disagreed though, and if so why or why not...? :-0 //Big Adamsky 18:55, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

I think the way it is now is the right way, but somehow I "like" danish-norwegian better. I can't explain why. Maybe it's the double no-sound which make dano-norwegian a bit odd in my ears.Inge 11:35, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] This is no longer history?

Rather than reverting your decision to remove the category:hisotry of norway designation, I'll sak here first. What is your logic? Tusen takk - Williamborg 02:44, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Of course it is history. And i my view important history. But since it is also in Category:Royal Danish-Norwegian Navy which is in Category:Denmark-Norway which is in Category:History of Norway I don't see why it should be listed in both categories. Inge 13:42, 18 April 2006 (UTC)