Talk:Royal Albert Bridge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

Thumb
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges, a WikiProject which aims to expand coverage of bridges on Wikipedia. Please feel free to join us.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Devon. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Devon project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.
Map needed
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in England may be able to help!

[edit] Irrelevant information should be removed

The paragraph "As a truss type" about the University of Phoenix Stadium, wrongly mentioned as "the Arizona Cardinals's new (multiple–use) stadium" is out of place here. Trusses with parts that are under tension or compression are a common engineering feature and this example is not clear in support of, nor does it resemble the Royal Albert Bridge design. Further does the information about "a grass field that rolls on rails" strike me as not being relevant. I think it should be removed. VanBurenen 10:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)