Talk:Roxy Ann Peak
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Volcanoes, a project to systematically present information on volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information), or join by visiting the project page. |
|
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale for WikiProject Volcanoes. | |
| If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments. | ||
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) | |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale for WikiProject Mountains. | |
| If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments. | ||
 |
This page is part of WikiProject Oregon, a WikiProject dedicated to articles related to the U.S. state of Oregon. To participate: join (or just read up) at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion. |
|
| PSU stuff & Applegate Trail are the current Collaborations of the week. | ||
| B | This page is rated as B-Class on the quality scale. | |
| Low | This article is rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | |
[edit] Federal Lands for Parks Act
Unresolved.Does anybody know anything about this act? Zab (talk) 06:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't personally know anything, but the information is at http://www.ci.medford.or.us/Files/Prescott%20Brochure.pdf. AKleinberg (talk) 17:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah I saw it there, but that's it. I find nothing in the federal record. The only thing I can think of is it must've been a county or state act, but that means hitting the historical societies and picking through their paper records. I'm actively looking for it, and will visit the Phoenix Genealogical office here in a few days.. Zab (talk) 18:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Assessment
Although this has improved, it is not quite B class. Its getting close. Need more geologic info than just a little on soil and it being a 30 million year old volcano. For instance types of rocks (besides just igneous). Try adding in some info about the general geologic forces working in the area, which may provide additional source material on the peak itself. Also, park hours are generally excluded. Then though I see trees in the picture, the vegetation of the peak is not covered. Beyond that, there are some tone/style issues that would need to be dealt with: "was also probably good" is not encyclopedic for instance. The WP:LEAD needs expansion, and then there are several citation/punctuation issues (proper: .[1]) (improper: [2].). But good job expanding and sourcing. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- I was happy with "start" class for all the garbage I dumped in to it under the guise of quality work. To be honest I was really confused about the assessment until I saw that AKleinberg (talk ยท contribs) requested one. Well, I am still confused, but hey! Zab (talk) 10:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- The only reason I asked for an assessment is to see what this article needs to improve on. (Thanks, Aboutmovies)! AKleinberg (talk) 15:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] added to Category:Mountains of Oregon
I added his to the category Mountains of Oregon even though it is already in the category Volcanoes of Oregon because it is a mountain. Some valcanoes are just holes in the ground (calderas for example).--DRoll (talk) 16:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
