Talk:Round and Round (Ratt song)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, an attempt to improve articles related to heavy metal music. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details on the projects. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. |
|
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need. |
|
The sarcastic philosophical discourse that compares them to Neo Hegelians (although humorous) is completely unwarranted given the nature of the project.
"The song serves as a definitive manifesto for the idealogical trajectory of the band. It's shamleless embrace of Absolute Idealism offers a striking juxtaposition to the popular worldviews of the day, including nihilism, existentialism, and social relativism. However, Ratt cannot be neatly catogorized as simple Neo Hegelians. Their work is rooted in Antiphon's rhetoric much more than Platonic discourse. Even then, Ratt also offered a new take on philosophy that can be ascribed to no one but Ratt, making them true originals." - Are you fucking kidding me? --68.48.204.113 06:56, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Is it really that puzzling that she turns into a rat, them being Ratt? -Syberghost (talk) 21:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Roundround.jpg
Image:Roundround.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
