Rotation operator

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article concerns the rotation operator, as it appears in quantum mechanics.

[edit] The translation operator

The rotation operator \,\mbox{R}(z, t), with the first argument \,z indicating the rotation axis and the second \,t = \theta the rotation angle, is based on the translation operator \,\mbox{T}(a), which is acting on the state |x\rangle in the following manner:

\mbox{T}(a)|x\rangle = |x + a\rangle

We have:

\,\mbox{T}(0) = 1
\,\mbox{T}(a) \mbox{T}(da)|x\rangle = \mbox{T}(a)|x + da\rangle = |x + a + da\rangle = \mbox{T}(a + da)|x\rangle \Rightarrow
\,\mbox{T}(a) \mbox{T}(da) = \mbox{T}(a + da)

Taylor development gives:

\,\mbox{T}(da) = \mbox{T}(0) + \frac{d\mbox{T}}{da(0)} da + ... = 1 - \frac{i}{h}\ p_x\ da

with

\,p_x = i h \frac{d\mbox{T}}{da(0)}

From that follows:

\,\mbox{T}(a + da) = \mbox{T}(a) \mbox{T}(da) = \mbox{T}(a)\left(1 - \frac{i}{h} p_x da\right) \Rightarrow
\,[\mbox{T}(a + da) - \mbox{T}(a)]/da = \frac{d\mbox{T}}{da} = - \frac{i}{h} p_x \mbox{T}(a)

This is a differential equation with the solution \,\mbox{T}(a) = \mbox{exp}\left(- \frac{i}{h} p_x a\right).

Additionally, suppose a Hamiltonian \,H is independent of the \,x position. Because the translation operator can be written in terms of \,p_x, and \,[p_x,H]=0, we know that \,[H,\mbox{T}(a)]=0. This result means that linear momentum for the system is conserved.

[edit] In relation to the orbital angular momentum

Classically we have \,l = r \times p. This is the same in quantum mechanics considering \,r and \,p as operators. An infinitesimal rotation \,dt about the z-axis can be expressed by the following infinitesimal translations:

\,x' = x - y dt
\,y' = y + x dt

From that follows:

\,\mbox{R}(z, dt)|r\rangle= \mbox{R}(z, dt)|x, y, z\rangle= |x - y dt, y + x dt, z\rangle= \mbox{T}_x(-y dt) \mbox{T}_y(x dt)|x, y, z\rangle= \mbox{T}_x(-y dt) \mbox{T}_y(x dt)|r\rangle

And consequently:

\,\mbox{R}(z, dt) = \mbox{T}_x (-y dt) \mbox{T}_y(x dt)

Using \,T_k(a) = \exp\left(- \frac{i}{h}\ p_k\ a\right) with \,k = x,y and Taylor development we get:

\,\mbox{R}(z, dt) = \exp\left[- \frac{i}{h}\ (x p_y - y p_x) dt\right]= \exp\left(- \frac{i}{h}\ l_z dt\right) = 1 - i/h l_z dt + ...

To get a rotation for the angle \,t, we construct the following differential equation using the condition R(z,0) = 1:

\,\mbox{R}(z, t + dt) = \mbox{R}(z, t) \mbox{R}(z, dt) \Rightarrow
\,[\mbox{R}(z, t + dt) - \mbox{R}(z, t)]/dt = d\mbox{R}/dt\,= \mbox{R}(z, t) [\mbox{R}(z, dt) - 1]/dt\,= - \frac{i}{h} l_z \mbox{R}(z, t) \Rightarrow
\,\mbox{R}(z, t) = \exp\left(- \frac{i}{h}\ t\ l_z\right)

Similar to the translation operator, if we are given a Hamiltonian \,H which rotationally symmetric about the z axis, \,[l_z,H]=0 implies \,[\mbox{R}(z,t),H]=0. This result means that angular momentum is conserved.

For the spin angular momentum about the y-axis we just replace \,l_z with \,s_y = \frac{h}{2} \sigma_y and we get the spin rotation operator \,\mbox{D}(y, t) = \exp\left(- i \frac{t}{2} \sigma_y\right).

[edit] Effect upon the spin operator and upon states

Operators can be represented by matrices. From linear algebra one knows that a certain matrix \,A can be represented in another base through the basis transformation

\,A' = P A P^{-1}

where \,P is the transformation matrix. If \,b and \,c are perpendicular to the y-axis and the angle \,t lies between them, the spin operator \,S_b can be transformed into the spin operator Sc through the following transformation:

\,S_c = \mbox{D}(y, t) S_b \mbox{D}^{-1}(y, t)

From standard quantum mechanics we have the known results \,S_b |b+\rangle = \frac{h}{2} |b+\rangle and \,S_c |c+\rangle = \frac{h}{2} |c+\rangle. So we have:

\,\frac{h}{2} |c+\rangle = S_c |c+\rangle = \mbox{D}(y, t) S_b \mbox{D}^{-1}(y, t) |c+\rangle \Rightarrow
\,S_b \mbox{D}^{-1}(y, t) |c+\rangle = \frac{h}{2} \mbox{D}^{-1}(y, t) |c+\rangle

Comparison with \,S_b |b+\rangle = \frac{h}{2} |b+\rangle

yields \,|b+\rangle = D^{-1}(y, t) |c+\rangle.

This can be generalized to arbitrary axes.